Trump is not immune from prosecution in his 2020 election interference case, US appeals court says

  • 📰 OakTribNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 76 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 34%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A federal appeals court panel has ruled Donald Trump can face trial on charges he plotted to overturn the results of the 2020 election. The court on Tuesday rejected the Republican ex-president&#82…

Former President Donald Trump speaks to the media at a Washington hotel, Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024, after attending a hearing before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals at the federal courthouse in Washington.

The one-month gap between when the appeals court heard arguments and when it issued its ruling has already created uncertainty about the timing of any trial in a calendar-jammed election year, with the judge overseeing the case last week canceling the March 4 date that was initially set and not immediately scheduling a replacement one. The judges gave Trump until February 12 to ask the Supreme Court to pause the ruling.

“Presidential immunity against federal indictment would mean that, as to the President, the Congress could not legislate, the Executive could not prosecute and the Judiciary could not review. We cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter,” the judges wrote.

The appeals court took center stage in the immunity dispute after the Supreme Court in December said it was at least temporarily staying out of it, rejecting a request from Smith’s team to take up the matter quickly and issue a speedy ruling. But the court could yet still decide to act on a Trump team appeal, adding to the uncertainty of a trial date.

But Smith’s team has said that no such immunity exists in the U.S. Constitution or in prior cases and that, in any event, Trump’s actions weren’t part of his official duties. The case was argued before Judges Florence Pan and J. Michelle Childs, appointees of Biden, a Democrat, and Karen LeCraft Henderson, who was named to the bench by President George H.W. Bush, a Republican.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 597. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Court: Trump not immune from prosecution in 2020 election interference caseMontgomery, Alabama
Source: ALNewsNetwork - 🏆 583. / 51 Read more »

Trump not immune from prosecution in 2020 election plot, court saysFormer President Donald Trump is not immune from prosecution in a case that charges him with plotting to overturn 2020 election, a U.S. appeals court said.
Source: CBS21NEWS - 🏆 304. / 63 Read more »

Trump immunity claim rejected by appeals court in 2020 election caseThe federal appeals court in Washington said former President Donald Trump is not entitled to immunity from prosecution.
Source: cbschicago - 🏆 546. / 51 Read more »

Appeals Court Denies Trump Immunity in 2020 Election CaseSee multiple perspectives from CNBC, New York Times (News), and Fox News (Online News) at AllSides.com.
Source: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 Read more »

Trump denied immunity in 2020 election interference case, US appeals court saysA federal appeals court panel has ruled Donald Trump can face trial on charges he plotted to overturn the results of the 2020 election. The court on Tuesday rejected the Republican ex-president’s claims he’s immune from prosecution.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »