A divided bench on the Minnesota Supreme Court showed skepticism over removing Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot during a Thursday hearing brought by challengers who say the former president sparked the Jan. 6 Capitol riot and should be disqualified.
"'Should we?' is the question that concerns me the most," Hudson added, pressing her view that the matter may ultimately be up to Congress to decide. While some of the justices were less convinced by this argument, there was also some openness to the challengers' request to hold future hearings to consider the obscure constitutional questions behind the underlying case arguments.
“Beginning before the 2020 election and culminating on Jan. 6, 2021, Donald Trump engaged in rebellion and insurrection against the Constitution of the United States in a desperate attempt to remain in office after losing the election,” Fein said. “Section 3 of the 14th Amendment protects the Republic from oath-breaking insurrectionists because its framers understood that if they’re allowed back into power, they will do the same or worse.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
At the Supreme Court, 'First Amendment interests all over the place'At issue were cases that test the ability of public officials to block critics from their 'personal' social medial pages, a practice that Donald Trump often engaged in when he was president.
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »
Minnesota Supreme Court to hear Donald Trump's ballot status argumentsEfforts to use the Constitution’s “insurrection' clause to prevent former President Donald Trump from running again for the White House turn to Minnesota on Thursday with oral arguments before the state Supreme Court, a hearing that will unfold as a similar case plays out in Colorado.
Source: FOX10Phoenix - 🏆 83. / 68 Read more »
Minnesota Supreme Court justices appear skeptical that states can block Trump from 2024 ballotMinnesota Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Thursday that states have the authority to block former President Donald Trump from the ballot, with some suggesting that Congress is best positioned to decide whether his role in the 2021 U.S. Capitol attack should prevent him from running.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Minnesota Supreme Court skeptical after hearing Donald Trump's ballot status argumentsMinnesota Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Thursday that states have the authority to block former President Donald Trump from the ballot, with some suggesting that Congress is best positioned to decide whether his role in the January 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol should prevent him from running.
Source: FOX26Houston - 🏆 448. / 53 Read more »
Democrats Continue ‘Reverse Court-Packing’ Supreme Court, Illegally Target Leonard Leo, Justices Thomas and AlitoSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Source: BreitbartNews - 🏆 610. / 51 Read more »
Court fights to prevent Trump from running again for the White House turn to MinnesotaEfforts to use the Constitution's 'insurrection' clause to prevent former President Donald Trump from running again for the White House are turning to Minnesota with oral arguments before the state Supreme Court.
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »