Minnesota Supreme Court skeptical after hearing Donald Trump's ballot status arguments

Efforts to use the Constitution’s "insurrection" clause to prevent former President Donald Trump from running again for the White House turn to Minnesota on Thursday with oral arguments before the state Supreme Court., with some suggesting that Congress is best positioned to decide whether his role in the January 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol should prevent him from running.

The oral arguments before the state Supreme Court were unfolding during an unprecedented week, as courts in two states were debating a question that even the nation’s highest court has never before settled — the meaning of the insurrection clause in the 14th Amendment, whether it should bar Trump from the ballot and whether states are even allowed to decide the question.

In the Minnesota case, the plaintiffs are asking the state’s highest court to declare that Trump is disqualified and direct the secretary of state to keep him off the ballot for the state’s March 5 primary. They want the court to order an evidentiary hearing, which would mean further proceedings and delay a final resolution, something Trump’s legal team opposes.

"Both the federal Constitution and Minnesota law place the resolution of this political issue where it belongs: the democratic process, in the hands of either Congress or the people of the United States,″ they wrote in one of their filings.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Minnesota Supreme Court to hear Donald Trump's ballot status argumentsEfforts to use the Constitution’s “insurrection' clause to prevent former President Donald Trump from running again for the White House turn to Minnesota on Thursday with oral arguments before the state Supreme Court, a hearing that will unfold as a similar case plays out in Colorado.
Source: FOX10Phoenix - 🏆 83. / 68 Read more »

Minnesota Supreme Court justices appear skeptical that states can block Trump from 2024 ballotMinnesota Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Thursday that states have the authority to block former President Donald Trump from the ballot, with some suggesting that Congress is best positioned to decide whether his role in the 2021 U.S. Capitol attack should prevent him from running.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court wrestles with social media cases that have echoes of Donald TrumpThe court is wrestling with whether public officials can block critics from commenting on their social media accounts. The issue first arose in a case involving the former president.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »

Democrats Continue ‘Reverse Court-Packing’ Supreme Court, Illegally Target Leonard Leo, Justices Thomas and AlitoSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Source: BreitbartNews - 🏆 610. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court confronts the question of trademark rights in 'Trump too small' caseAnother day, another Supreme Court case with a mention of former President Donald Trump
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

Supreme Court confronts the question of trademark rights in 'Trump too small' caseAnother day, another Supreme Court case with a mention of former President Donald Trump.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »