The high court found in Abdul Nacer Benbrika’s favour on Wednesday, and ruled that section 36D of the Citizenship Act is invalidThe high court found in Abdul Nacer Benbrika’s favour on Wednesday, and ruled that section 36D of the Citizenship Act is invalid
Benbrika argued that the laws were not constitutional as they gave the minister powers that should be reserved for the judiciary – namely, the power to punish someone for criminal conduct. “That there are circumstances where, after a person has been convicted and punished, additional punishment can be imposed, is not an unprecedented idea,” he said. “Forfeiture is an example of that very thing occurring.”
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »