FILE - Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Janet Protasiewicz attends her first hearing as a justice, Sept. 7, 2023, in Madison, Wis. Wisconsin’s top Republican state lawmaker who had threatened to possibly impeach the newly elected liberal Supreme Court justice if she didn’t step down from a redistricting case didn’t mention that option Monday, Oct. 9, in his first comments since Protasiewicz decided against recusal.
Prosser turned the email over to the liberal watchdog group American Oversight as part of an open records request. The group has“To sum up my views, there should be no effort to impeach Justice Protasiewicz on anything we know now,” Prosser wrote to Vos. “Impeachment is so serious, severe, and rare that it should not be considered unless the subject has committed a crime, or the subject has committed indisputable ‘corrupt conduct’ while ‘in office.
Vos on Monday made his first comments about Protasiewicz since she declined to recuse from the case and Vos got the email from Prosser. In his statement,Vos raised the threat of impeachment because he argued that Protasiewicz had prejudged the redistricting case when during her campaign she called the current maps “rigged” and “unfair.” Vos also said that her acceptance of nearly $10 million from the Wisconsin Democratic Party would unduly influence her ruling.
Protasiewicz on Friday rejected those arguments, noting that other justices have accepted campaign cash and not recused from cases. She also noted that she never promised or pledged to rule on the redistricting lawsuit in any way.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice advises Republican leader against impeachmentThere should be no effort to impeach a liberal Wisconsin Supreme Court justice based on what is known now, a former justice advised the Republican legislative leader who asked him to review the issue
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Wisconsin Supreme Court sides with tenant advocates in limiting eviction recordsThe Wisconsin Supreme Court has voted to reduce from 20 years to two years the time when most eviction records have to be kept on the state court website. The change was sought by tenant rights advocates who argued that the longer record-keeping has made it more difficult for people with lower incomes to find housing. The Wisconsin Realtors Association argued that the rule change could lead landlords to charge higher deposits to protect themselves. Monday's vote was 4-3, with liberals in support
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Wisconsin GOP leader silent on impeachment of Supreme Court justice after earlier floating itWisconsin’s top Republican state lawmaker, who had threatened to possibly impeach a newly elected liberal state Supreme Court justice if she didn’t step down from a redistricting case, doesn’t mention that option in his first comments since the justice decided against recusal
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Wisconsin GOP leader silent on impeachment of Supreme Court justice after earlier floating itWisconsin’s top Republican state lawmaker, who had threatened to possibly impeach a newly elected liberal state Supreme Court justice if she didn’t step down from a redistricting case, doesn’t mention that option in his first comments since the justice decided against recusal. Justice Janet Protasiewicz declined late Friday to recuse from the redistricting case and sided with the liberal majority of the court to take up the lawsuit. The case seeks to overturn Republican-drawn legislative maps. O
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Colorado Supreme Court needs to end the harassment of Jack PhillipsMatt Lamb is a contributor to the Washington Examiner's Beltway Confidential blog.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Supreme Court to hear appeal over expert testimony in Yuma drug caseThe Supreme Court will hear the appeal of an Arizona man who said his right to confront his accuser was violated when the expert witness who tested the drugs in his case was replaced.
Source: kgun9 - 🏆 584. / 51 Read more »