Wisconsin Supreme Court sides with tenant advocates in limiting eviction records

  • 📰 AP
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 61 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 28%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Wisconsin Supreme Court has voted to reduce from 20 years to two years the time when most eviction records have to be kept on the state court website. The change was sought by tenant rights advocates who argued that the longer record-keeping has made it more difficult for people with lower incomes to find housing. The Wisconsin Realtors Association argued that the rule change could lead landlords to charge higher deposits to protect themselves. Monday's vote was 4-3, with liberals in support

MADISON, Wis. — The Wisconsin Supreme Court voted Monday in its first public administrative conference in more than a decade to reduce from 20 years to two years the time when most eviction records must be kept on the state court website.The court voted 4-3, with liberals in support and conservatives against, for shortening the record-keeping on the state court website, commonly referred to by the acronym CCAP.

Legal Action of Wisconsin sought the change for cases where there is no money judgment against a tenant. At a hearing last month, tenant advocates said the change would help renters with eviction histories, since many landlords rely solely on the statewide court website for determining whether to rent to someone.Liberal Wisconsin Supreme Court justice rejects GOP call to recuse on redistricting casesJustice Brian Hagedorn dissented.

“It just feels odd to me this court would get into it this way by shutting down access to records,” Hagedorn said Monday. “That’s a significant thing.” Numerous landlord groups, including the Wisconsin Realtors Association, opposed the proposal. They argued that changing the rule could result in landlords charging higher rental deposits tAo protect themselves, a change that will negatively affect all renters.

Justices voted to make the change in an open conference, something they haven’t held since 2012. The court’s new liberal majorityseeking to overturn Republican-drawn legislative maps. Newly elected liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz decided against recusing in that case, despite threats from Republican lawmakers to impeach her if she hears it.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 728. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Myanmar Supreme Court rejects jailed Suu Kyi appealsMyanmar Supreme Court rejects jailed Suu Kyi appeals
Source: Investingcom - 🏆 450. / 53 Read more »

Myanmar Supreme Court rejects jailed Suu Kyi appealsThe Supreme Court in military-ruled Myanmar has rejected appeals against six corruption convictions for the jailed former leader Aung San Suu Kyi, according to media reports.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

UK Supreme Court weighs if it's lawful for Britain to send asylum-seekers to RwandaThe U.K. Supreme Court is set to weigh whether the British government’s contentious policy to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda is lawful.
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »

UK Supreme Court weighs if it's lawful for Britain to send asylum-seekers to RwandaThe U.K. Supreme Court is set to weigh whether the British government’s contentious policy to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda is lawful
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »