Supreme Court justices tell Congress they are not considering televising hearings

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 43 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

But the chief justice is “studying” whether the court needs its own ethics code, Justice Elena Kagan says.

By Robert Barnes Robert Barnes Reporter covering the U.S. Supreme Court Email Bio Follow March 7 at 6:39 PM Despite public support for televising Supreme Court hearings, the ban will remain for the foreseeable future and the issue isn’t much of a topic of conversation among the justices, two of them told a House appropriations subcommittee Thursday.

At the hearing called to review the court’s budget request, Alito said much of its proposed increase would be spent on physical and cyber security. Although he was not specific, Alito said there were a “startling” number of attempts in the past year to hack into the court’s computer system. Kagan said that when she observed the court as President Barack Obama’s solicitor general she thought it would be good for the public to see what she saw.

If seeing the court at work “came at the expense of the way the institution functioned, that would be a very bad bargain,” she said. Instead, he said, showing the court at work “would do wonders to correct the American people’s often biased perception of our nation’s top court.” But she indicated the court is aware of the perception that it does not play by the rules set for others.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Question: why isn't there a comparable 'Code of Ethics' for the Executive and Legislative branches a la The Judicial Code of Ethics? (cricket, cricket)

they are not doing any television hearings. And no justice has said any thing about ethics

The Supreme Court should not be a political pawn for the FAKE NEWS like the Washed Out Post to pick apart or play favorites! Keep the Supreme Court out of the spotlight & off TV! The Washed Out Post can pay a reporter to sit there and take notes if they need more news to cover!

Good

Good

Good! Best not to have talking heads opine on the law and politicize it further.

Good. Keep cameras out of there. We've seen what it's done to the legislative branch.

Why do we have 9? Why not 12 and have 6 conservative and 6 liberals.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

California Supreme Court to decide whether government can cut pensionsFor more than 60 years, California has adhered to the so-called 'California Rule,' which guarantees workers the pensions that were in place the day they were hired. This has stymied state and local lawmakers now wrestling with hundreds of billions of dollars in pension shortfall. Politicians who made promises that cldnt possibly be kept Save his interests The bigger issue in that story - “constitutionally guaranteed public pension” WTF - when did we change the California Constitution for these GROSS UNETHICAL ABSURDLY OVERINFLATED pensions? And more importantly how do we change the constitution back
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court punts on taxpayer funding for historic preservation of churchesThe U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review a New Jersey case in which churches have been barred from receiving tax dollars meant for historic preservation. Separation of Church and State. Unless it is going to be turned into a museum with minimal costs foe upkeep it should not be taxpayer funded We also need a maximum budget for all churches across the whole USA . Maybe $500,000 nationwide to pay for utilities. No should not do it.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court likely to shut down Trump's national emergency declaration, Rand Paul predicts'In fact, I think the president’s own picks to the Supreme Court may rebuke him on this,' the Republican senator said. And then liberals will praise the conservative supreme court majority....lol. Let it run its course. Let SCOTUS decide. Today we have several national emergencies that have taken many lives. Americans are taught to prioritize, plan and prepare for such seen and unforeseen tragedy. A border wall does not exhibit an emergency mgt. tool that would prevent imminent loss of life, goods, nor recovery.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

California Supreme Court curbs a pension benefit but preserves ‘California Rule’For more than 60 years, California has adhered to the so-called 'California Rule,' which guarantees workers the pensions that were in place the day they were hired. This has stymied state and local lawmakers now wrestling with hundreds of billions of dollars in pension shortfall. YEEEEESSSSSS With Socialism eventually you run out of other people's money. The time is coming soon for CA. Spending other people’s money and out of control spending has consequences. You own it California. You voted for this.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court lets stand $4-million verdict against L.A. County deputies in shootingThe Supreme Court let stand a $4-million verdict against two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were searching for a fugitive and mistakenly shot an innocent homeless couple sleeping in a shed behind a Lancaster home.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Killer Mike, 21 Savage file Supreme Court brief over rapper in prison for lyricsRap stars Killer Mike, 21 Savage, Meek Mill and others filed a Supreme Court brief asking justices to review the conviction of a Pennsylvania rapper for his lyrics. The first amendment does cover rap lyrics, but not when you confess to actual crimes you committed that are discovered to be true. Good god on that basis there are hundreds of thousands of twitter thugs tweeting today you could lock up - Over rapper..
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Perspective | A century of rulings: How the Supreme Court has remade free speechSince 1919, the Court has been reinterpreting, and limiting, the First Amendment. We are living in the biblical times of the judges....everyone doing what is right in their own eyes Hey WashingtonPost do you have Free Speech in Qatar 🤔🤔 For ones, it is no longer a Free Speech, but a paid Corporate Speech. SCOTUS decision in Citizens United radically changed definition of Free Speech.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Hip hop artists to Supreme Court: Pittsburgh rapper's lyrics are not 'a true threat of violence'Several famous rappers are urging the US Supreme Court to take up a case involving a Pittsburgh rapper and whether his song lyrics are protected under the First Amendment Really? Does Supreme Court take Special treatment cases? He should be treated just like the Sudanese and many who were deported for violating immigration laws. VISA overstayers Unless it’s a call to action, yes, it is protected. Free speech/hate speech = The same thing.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Supreme Court Considers Implementing Code of Conduct for JusticesChief Justice John Roberts is weighing whether to create a code of conduct for members of the Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan told lawmakers. BS, he's exploring? Code of judicial conduct for the SCOTUS can be the same one that all other Federal judges employ. Not hard. They just like being above reproach. High time, too! IMHO!!! He must see Kavanaugh as we do, eh? Biased, belligerent, bawling, beer-bragging Brett Kavanaugh violated all codes of conduct before he even started. No one can ever believe Biased Brett is decent Justice material.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »