State Laws Banning ‘Experimental Sex-Change Treatments’ for Children To Remain in Force, Appeals Court Rules

  • 📰 LegInsurrection
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 19 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 95%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that transgender people are 'politically powerless,' citing broad support, and dismissed their parental rights argument: 'becoming a parent does not create a right to reject democratically enacted laws.'

laws. The court ordered an expedited review of the matter before making a final decision on the preliminary injunction, asThe court’s final decision yesterday provided a more thorough analysis of the legal issues, which included due process, parental rights, equal protection, and allegations of sex-based discrimination.the decision as a victory “in his fight to protect Kentucky children from experimental sex-change treatments.

The court rejected the plaintiffs’ parental rights argument, too: “becoming a parent does not create a right to reject democratically enacted laws” concerning “reasonably banned treatments.” Moreover, the court found the laws at issue restricted the same procedure—”gender-affirming care”—for both sexes, further weakening the claim of sex discrimination.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 3. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

US Supreme Court to weigh state laws constraining social media companiesThe U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to decide the legality of Republican-backed state laws that constrain the ability of social media companies to curb content on their platforms that these businesses deem objectionable. The justices took up two cases involving challenges by technology industry groups who argued that the 2021 laws in Texas and Florida restricting content-moderation practices of large social media platforms violate the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protections for freedom of speech.
Source: YahooFinanceCA - 🏆 47. / 63 Read more »

US Supreme Court to weigh state laws constraining social media companiesBy Andrew Chung (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to decide the legality of Republican-backed state laws that constrain the ability ...
Source: SaltWire Network - 🏆 45. / 63 Read more »

The Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the ConstitutionWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether state laws that seek to regulate Facebook, TikTok, X and other social media platforms violate the Constitution.
Source: SooToday - 🏆 8. / 85 Read more »

The Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the ConstitutionWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether state laws that seek to regulate Facebook, TikTok, X and other social media platforms violate the Constitution. The justices will review laws enacted by Republican-dominated legislatures and signed by Republican governors in Florida and Texas. While the details vary, both laws aim to prevent the social media companies from censoring users based on their viewpoints. The court's announcement, three days before the start of its new
Source: YahooFinanceCA - 🏆 47. / 63 Read more »

Appeals court upholds Tennessee, Kentucky bans on transgender care for minorsBy Brendan Pierson (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Thursday allowed Tennessee and Kentucky to enforce laws banning gender-affirming medical care ...
Source: SaltWire Network - 🏆 45. / 63 Read more »