agreed Friday to decide whether state laws that seek to regulate Facebook, TikTok, X and other social media platforms violate the Constitution.by Republican-dominated legislatures and signed by Republican governors in Florida and Texas. While the details vary, both laws aim to prevent the social media companies from censoring users based on their viewpoints.
Separately, the high court also could consider a lower-court order limiting executive branch officials’ communications with social media companies about controversial online posts. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan and Neil Gorsuch would have allowed the law to remain in effect. In dissent, Alito wrote, “Social media platforms have transformed the way people communicate with each other and obtain news.”
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
The Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the ConstitutionWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether state laws that seek to regulate Facebook, TikTok, X and other social media platforms violate the Constitution.
Source: SooToday - 🏆 8. / 85 Read more »
US Supreme Court to weigh state laws constraining social media companiesBy Andrew Chung (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to decide the legality of Republican-backed state laws that constrain the ability ...
Source: SaltWire Network - 🏆 45. / 63 Read more »
US Supreme Court to weigh state laws constraining social media companiesThe U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to decide the legality of Republican-backed state laws that constrain the ability of social media companies to curb content on their platforms that these businesses deem objectionable. The justices took up two cases involving challenges by technology industry groups who argued that the 2021 laws in Texas and Florida restricting content-moderation practices of large social media platforms violate the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protections for freedom of speech.
Source: YahooFinanceCA - 🏆 47. / 63 Read more »
Social Media Laws Backed by GOP Draw US Supreme Court ScrutinyThe US Supreme Court agreed to review Florida and Texas laws that would sharply restrict the ability of the largest social media platforms to police political misinformation in a case that will shape the rules online in the run-up to the 2024 election.
Source: BNNBloomberg - 🏆 83. / 50 Read more »
Indigenous groups stand firm with child welfare law before Supreme CourtBill C-92 affirms that Indigenous nations have sole authority of their children and establishes minimum standards in caring for them
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »