WASHINGTON, DC – The Supreme Court rejected Alabama’s redistricting plan for congressional seats a second time on Tuesday by a unanimous vote, suggesting the justices might have regarded this map as defiance against the Supreme Court’s previous 5-4 decision against a similar map.
Conservatives have long argued that these race-based assumptions violate a core promise of the Equal Protection Clause, that Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution requires government to be colorblind.. Justice Thomas’s dissent in the case captured the disappointment of conservatives, beginning with: “These cases are yet another installment in the disastrous misadventure of this Court’s voting rights jurisprudence.”, two of Alabama’s seven congressional seats should thus include enough black voters to elect Democrats — again, based on the racial theory that black citizens will largely vote for a particular party.
The Alabama attorney general asked for the Supreme Court to stay the lower-court decision until the Supreme Court could decide whether to take the case.There is more than one explanation for the unanimous vote, but none look good for the Cotton State. One explanation is that the Supreme Court is just waiting for a formal petition for certiorari down the road and would, at that time, consider taking up this appeal but is not yet committed to doing so.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »
Source: mynbc15 - 🏆 262. / 63 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »