Supreme Court rejects Alabama’s bid to use congressional map with just one majority-Black district

Sadie Janes shows off her voting sticker after having cast her ballot during the Democratic presidential primary in Montgomery, Ala., on March 3, 2020.WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday handed a defeat to Alabama Republicans for the second time in three months, rejecting their latest attempt to use a congressional map that includes only one majority-Black district.

The court in two related applications refused emergency requests from Republican state officials to block lower court rulings that invalidated the new map. Lower court proceedings to approve a new map are still ongoing.in June that reaffirmed a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act. There were no noted dissenting votes and the court did not explain its reasoning.

The Supreme Court's earlier ruling forced the state back to the drawing board. But the new map — like the previous one — includes only one district where Black voters are likely to be able to elect a candidate of their choosing. Alabama has seven congressional districts, and 27% of the state's population is Black.

The new map was thrown out in two different lower court rulings, with the judges saying an additional minority-Black district was required, in line with the Supreme Court's June ruling. “We are not aware of any other case in which a state legislature — faced with a federal court order declaring that its electoral plan unlawfully dilutes minority votes and requiring a plan that provides an additional opportunity district — responded with a plan that the state concedes does not provide that district," one of the court

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Whistleblowers Ask the Texas Supreme Court To Return Their Case To Trial CourtFour whistleblowers, former top deputies of the Texas Attorney General’s Office who reported Attorney General Ken Paxton to federal authorities, continued their legal fight on Monday despite Paxton prevailing in the impeachment proceedings against him. In a Monday filing to the Texas Supreme Court, Blake Brickman, Ryan Vassar, Mark Penley...
Source: HoustonPress - 🏆 314. / 61 Read more »

ProPublica Report Questions Clarence Thomas’ Impartiality In Upcoming Supreme Court CaseSee multiple perspectives from ProPublica, Newsweek, and Fox News (Online News) at AllSides.com.
Source: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 Read more »

Newsom defends 'paralyzed' California officials in asking Supreme Court to intervene on homeless encampmentsGov. Gavin Newsom asked the Supreme Court to intervene, claiming California city leaders face an 'unsurmountable roadblock' in clearing homeless encampments.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Supreme Court to deliberate on the ambiguity of 'And' in criminal sentencing lawIn particular, the justices will be examining a so-called safety valve provision that is meant to spare low-level, nonviolent drug dealers who agree to plead guilty and cooperate with prosecutors from having to face often longer mandatory sentences.
Source: fox5ny - 🏆 587. / 51 Read more »

Justice Samuel Alito Is Just Begging for Regulations on the Supreme CourtHis defiance over ethics concerns only drives home their importance, and how much more robust standards need to be applied to the high court.
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »

| The Founders were wrong to grant Supreme Court justices life tenureThere are no easy solutions to the problem, but it is clearly a problem.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »