that the ballot's language"introduces an ethical judgment," saying that it"does not establish that the ballot board’s language constitutes improper persuasion.
The ballot board had approved language to"prohibit the citizens of the State of Ohio from directly or indirectly burdening, penalizing, or prohibiting abortion before an unborn child is determined to be viable." The court ordered the ballot board"to adopt ballot language that accurately describes that the proposed amendment regulates actions of the 'State.'"
A spokesperson for Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights said in a statement Tuesday that this was another attempt by the ballot board to “mislead voters.” “Issue 1 is clearly and concisely written to protect Ohioans’ right to make our own personal health care decisions about contraception, pregnancy, and abortion, free from government interference,” Lauren Blauvelt said. “The actual amendment language communicates that right clearly and without distortion.”
Cianciolo said the ballot board would be quickly reconvened to make the “minor change ordered by the court.”
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: clevelanddotcom - 🏆 301. / 63 Read more »
Source: washingtonian - 🏆 74. / 68 Read more »
Source: Cointelegraph - 🏆 562. / 51 Read more »