WASHINGTON - U.S. Supreme Court justices on Wednesday signaled a willingness to let a 40-foot-tall cross-shaped war memorial stay on public land in Maryland despite a legal challenge that called it an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion.
Justice Stephen Breyer, one of the court’s four liberals, suggested a compromise ruling allowing the cross to remain based in part on the fact it was built in 1925 while making it clear that newly built religious symbols would be treated differently.On one hand “we’re not going to have people trying to tear down historical monuments,” Breyer said. But on the other, “we are a different country now” that is more pluralistic, he added.
Fred Edwords and two other plaintiffs filed a 2014 lawsuit challenging the cross as a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from establishing an official religion and bars governmental actions favoring one religion over another. “So why in a case like that can we not say essentially the religious content has been stripped of this monument?” Kagan asked.
Edwords, who is retired, is a long-time member and previous employee of the American Humanist Association, which advocates for the separation of church and state.
Good.👍
Maryland......Fairyland .
That's was for our troops and those who never made it home
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
In major religion case, U.S. top court sympathetic toward Maryland crossSupreme Court justices on Wednesday signaled a willingness to rule that a 40-foo... Good. Its a cross that even God children have dushonored. A child molesters haven the church... welcome to the Pope's & Pontiff's Heavely Palace of Proverbial Pleasures liquor in front poker in the rear!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
In major religion case, Supreme Court weighs Maryland cross disputeThe conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday takes up one of the bi... The cross is a phallic symbol- John M. Allegro, The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross. Top bar, phallus, 2 side bars, testicles, lower bar a holding mechanism for parades... 9000 B.C.E. So, since penis is sacred, is rape a crime? cdnpoli These Humanists are becoming more intolerant and Christophobic ... and this nation is falling deeper & deeper into depravity as Americans acquiesce to secularism, liberalism, globalism & utter stupidity.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
U.S. top court backs killer who forgot crime in death penalty caseStates may not execute prisoners who cannot rationally understand the reasons fo... Prerry sure the victim's family remembers. Leftists : celebrating infanticide, and clemency for murderers... Absurd ruling. It's like saying that it's more ethical to farm humans for meat than chickens, because the chicken cannot understand the implications of and reason for its impending butchering, while the human can. The death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment, period.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court to decide fate of cross-shaped WWI memorial in MarylandThe Supreme Court hears arguments on whether a 40-foot Bladensburg, Maryland, cross-shaped war memorial violates the First Amendment. Should it be taken down? Emotionally I would leave the cross, legally it should be moved. Were any of the 49 soldiers members of any other religion? If not, then the answer is it does not entangle itself in religion. who is offended by this one?
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court will look at whether a cross is promotion of religion or war memorialThe Supreme Court, long divided on the role of religion, is set to decide whether a 40-foot Latin cross in Maryland is an unconstitutional official endorsement of Christianity or a historic memorial for local soldiers who died in World War I. How can an agreed upon religious symbol memorialize people who did not believe in or agree with that symbol. It's as insulting as Mormons 'saving' dead people by declaring them Mormons in the afterlife. Magical Thinking is Magical Thinking is MAGICAL THINKING. What's next changing all the crosses in Normandy? Its been there a hundred years and no issues. Get over yourselves. Next war? Don't put religious symbols then. Mt Soledad reboot...
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Supreme Court's Kavanaugh and Gorsuch seem split in blockbuster case over WW1 memorial crossThe justices sparred over the meaning of a 93-year-old Latin cross that looms large over a crowded Maryland intersection the suburbs of the nation's capital. No one is required to become a Christian to enter the park. This is not the same as being required to eschew meat to live in the holy place of the Green New Deal. what does he mean by some people may not even have standing with Gorsuch expressing skepticism about whether those opposing the cross even have standing... what do you mean even have standing? that sounds like a stupid thing to say Gorsuch
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court balances history and religion in deciding monument’s fateIs the Bladensburg Peace Cross unconstitutional or a secular honor to World War I heroes? Move it or sell to a private organization do similar like Ram Mandir in Ayodhya (India) It stays
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »