Opinion | No Friend-of-the-Court Senator

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 18 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Opinion: Sheldon Whitehouse has long tried to silence his political opponents. Now’s he’s trying muzzle Americans trying to influence the High Court via legal arguments.

WSJOpinion Updated Feb. 25, 2019 2:26 p.m. ET Sheldon Whitehouse is back, so hide the Constitution. The Rhode Island Senator was last spotted examining high school yearbooks to keep Brett Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court. Now the Democrat is trying to muzzle Americans trying to influence the High Court via legal arguments. In a Jan.

As Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders removes the stigma attached to socialism within the Democratic Party by broadening his agenda with Medicare For All, the Green New Deal and free college places—the team discuss whether a socialist can recreate the magic of 2016? Video: Journal Editorial Report / Image: Getty To Read the Full Story

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

The garbage this editorial board churns out is so unbelievably disingenuous. He’s trying to make it so that the lobbying groups filing law briefs have to disclose who’s funding them. Showing how giant dark-money donors are influencing our legal system is “muzzling”? Bulls***.

'Sheldon Whitehouse' sounds like a psychopath's alter ego

The media journalists should be muzzled and their key boards taken away. Then hv alexia spy on their sources. They cannot confirm, therefore they are useless.

RT : Opinion: Sheldon Whitehouse has long tried to silence his political opponents. ...

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Opinion | The Supreme Court has a chance to clear up decades of confusionThe justices have the chance to undo past confusion over Bladensburg’s Peace Cross with their ruling. The injustice of PAYING PEOPLE TO SOW DIVISION IN OUR COUNTRY! Watch! Mmmmm Why did the chicken cross the road?
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Opinion | It'll take more than a Supreme Court case to end police abuse of property rightsOpinion | Scott Lemieux: Police abused civil forfeiture laws for so long that the Supreme Court stepped in. But one ruling won't end it. - NBCNewsTHINK
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Opinion | Puerto Rico and the ConstitutionOpinion: A court ruling could devastate Puerto Rico unless Congress acts, writes daskeel daskeel Shameful that we basically let them rot. daskeel How was the DC Oversight Board set up, I can’t remember. daskeel Can't read the article from The Wall Street Journal . Can someone tell me what is going on ?How is Puerto Rico devastated by this?
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court: Judges can't rule from beyond the graveWASHINGTON (AP) — Federal judges can't rule from beyond the grave, the Supreme Court said Monday. The high court said in an unsigned opinion that a federal court can't count the vote of a... As much as I hate the result, I can’t knock the logic. This was an a actual question to opine on? What would they do next to twist the law🤡🤡🤡🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Bingo
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Limits Civil Asset Forfeiture, Rules Excessive Fines Apply To StatesBREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously today that the Constitution's ban on excessive fines applies to state and local governments, thus limiting their ability to use fines to raise revenue. You said it in the tweet, it’s not “revenue”, it’s THEFT I've lost a lot of faith in the Court in recent years, but I like this decision. Yes, Hooray!!!! Need to stop , Excessive Fines, can't drive our cars in peace.
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Opinion | Justice Clarence Thomas' attack on libel law should worry free speech advocatesOpinion | Steve Vladeck: President Trump's attacks on the First Amendment and the press gain an ally in Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas - NBCNewsTHINK THINK On the contrary. It should only be of concern to the purveyors of FakeNews THINK I encourage my workmates to not microwave fish but that doesn’t mean they will do so. THINK JusticeThomas a right leaning SCOTUS and realDonaldTrump make 1A PressFreedom and NYTimes v Sullivan more important than ever. I think CJRoberts understands this.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court overturns 9th Circuit equal-pay decision because of judge’s death“Federal judges are appointed for life, not for eternity,” the high court said in a brief, unsigned opinion. Time for god to judge you So maybe Trump was right about the 9th circuit incompetence and general political grandstanding . . .
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Clarence Thomas agrees with Trump that libel laws should be easedSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas filed a solo opinion Tuesday that should appeal to President Trump. He said the high court should make it easier for public officials to sue the press for libel. Anita Hill... That is BULLSHIT! This guy
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

‘Appointed for Life, Not for Eternity’: Supreme Court Voids Deceased Judge’s VoteThe Supreme Court on Monday threw out a 2018 opinion on a gender-pay dispute because it was written by a federal appeals judge who had died a couple of weeks before the court announced its decision. This was not 'decided' after his death ... it was 'reported' after his death.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Justice Ginsburg returns to the Supreme Court after surgeryThe 85-year-old justice, who had a portion of one of her lungs removed after cancer was found, asked the first question in a case. Welcome back RBG: “don’t worry y’all, I’m doing just fine”!
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »