U.S. District Judge Brantley Starr made the decision after ruling that Southwest was in contempt of court for defying a previous order he issued in a case involving a flight attendant who said she was fired for expressing her opposition to abortion. She sued Southwest and won.Sign up for NECN newsletters.
Southwest has appealed Starr's sanctions, which also include emailing a statement that the judge wrote to its flight attendants to say that the airline is not permitted to discriminate based on employee's religious beliefs. The airline, which is based in Dallas, is already appealing the jury verdict in the flight attendant's favor.
ADF is “just one voice” on the subject of religious freedom, Lopez said, “and they are a voice that many people view as being very controversial and very narrow.” Steven Collis, director of a law and religion clinic at the University of Texas at Austin, said it is within a judge's authority to order this kind of training.
Starr held senior jobs in the Texas Attorney General’s office. According to a questionnaire he filled out for the Senate Judiciary Committee, he worked on a lawsuit against the Obama administration for telling public schools to let transgender students decide which restrooms to use, defended a state law that banned sanctuary cities for immigrants, and sued to block a plan to defer deportation of some undocumented immigrants.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ShropshireStar - 🏆 98. / 51 Read more »
Source: FullFact - 🏆 88. / 53 Read more »
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »
Source: MENnewsdesk - 🏆 23. / 69 Read more »