'Fireman' v. 'Firefighter': These Lawmakers Want Less Gendered Language in the Law - Ms. Magazine

  • 📰 MsMagazine
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 65 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 29%
  • Publisher: 59%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The U.S. legal code currently defaults to the masculine form when referring to people, but the Equality in Our Laws Act would change that.

Jennifer Gerson, The 19th

that found that men were perceived as being better fits for leadership positions when a masculine job title was used in a job description as evidence of the importance of having a mandated shift away from gendered language in the U.S. legal code. A 2019 research project conducted by the World Bank found thatrates for women and the reinforcement of regressive gender norms.

The Equality in Our Laws Act would direct the Office of Law Revision Counsel to to make non-substantive, gender-neutral revisions to many portions of the legal code. Laws like the Violence Against Women Act and the statute establishing the Women-Owned Small Business Federal Contracting Program would continue to be able to use gender-specific language in an effort to create rights and protections.

Should the bill pass, it would change “he” to “the Secretary” when referring to the head of a federal agency and “fireman” and “policeman” to “firefighter” and “police officer.” But its passage at this time is unlikely. Lee acknowledges the reality of the current makeup of the House of Representatives, where Republicans hold the majority. Still, she said, “if we’re not proposing fixes, if we’re not proposing legislation that’s going to help people, we can expect to stay in the minority.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 378. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines