PolitiFact - The Supreme Court ended affirmative action for colleges. Are legacy admissions next to go?

, former first lady Michelle Obama wrote that money, power and privilege — including having parents who graduated from the same school — are accepted as"perfectly justifiable forms of affirmative action."Legacy admissions policies give admissions preference to applicants who have familial connections to alumni or other people affiliated with a college. Schools

. The committee said the practice keeps bonds between the university and alumni, and that alumni donations help fund financial aid plans that diversify the student body.Extensive data on legacy admissions is not available because many schools don’t publicly release the information.from The National Association for College Admission Counseling showed that about half of four-year colleges consider applicants’ ties to alumni during admissions.

"Among elite private schools, it is safe to assume that all of them implement legacy preferences," said Tyler Ransom, a University of Oklahoma economics professor who hasbased on data released in the Harvard case."I suspect that most public universities observe the practice as well, though many public universities are not selective enough for it to matter."

Opponents’ argument that legacy admissions mostly benefit white, wealthy applicants is backed by evidence.were white, and that"a white typical applicant with a 10% chance of admission would see a five-fold increase in admissions likelihood if they were a legacy." Tillery said legacy admissions mostly benefit white students, but that doesn’t necessarily mean someone else is being disadvantaged. He said 75% of the students Harvard rejects are qualified to be admitted.

"Both preferences are deeply unpopular, but legacy preferences are worse because they constitute affirmative action for the rich," said Kahlenberg, who is a nonresident scholar at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Putting the Supreme in the Supreme Court | ShenemanAll rise! It's mandatory.
Source: njdotcom - 🏆 282. / 63 Read more »

John Roberts ended the Supreme Court term by whining about criticismThis toxic mixture of arrogance and victimhood will carry through to next term and beyond, Jordan_S_Rubin writes.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

The Supreme Court Just Legalized StalkingThe court has assured stalkers that they will not only be able to terrorize with impunity, but with acclaim.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court struck down affirmative action, but that won't stop HarvardThe Supreme Court ended racial discrimination in university admissions, but colleges are already talking about how they will find ways to skirt the ruling.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Politicians Explain Why They Refuse To Expand The Supreme CourtCurrently, the U.S. Supreme Court sits nine justices, three of whom were appointed by former President Donald Trump. The Onion asked politicians why they oppose President Biden expanding the court and appointing more justices of his own, and this is what they said. Politicians Explain Why They Refuse To Expand The Supreme Court
Source: TheOnion - 🏆 724. / 51 Read more »

The Squad's wild, illogical attacks on the Supreme CourtThis just-concluded Supreme Court term was filled with decisions upholding the requirements of the Constitution regarding individual rights, human equality, and separation of powers.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »