Putting the Supreme in the Supreme Court | Sheneman

  • 📰 njdotcom
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 81 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 36%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

All rise! It's mandatory.

Listen, we all saw this coming. Anyone who pays even passing attention to the machinations of the court knew how this term would ultimately shake out. Late June/early July is decision season and those crafty jurists tried throwing us a curve ball early on by reaffirming some elements of the Voting Rights Act, but then last week they dropped the hammer.

The six conservative justices decided Congress shouldn’t have all the policy-making fun so they struck down LGBTQ protections and sent affirmative action packing. Reached for comment, the GOP decided they don’t mind activist judges anymore. Don’t miss an issue of our Opinion newsletter! Get it delivered each Wednesday right into your inbox by adding your email below and hitting"subscribe."The Supreme Court has dropped any pretense of being an independent body. It is now a purely partisan branch of the federal government willing to ignore decades of case law and precedent to achieve their desired outcome.

Originalism isn’t a judicial philosophy, it’s an excuse. Adjudicating based on a centuries-old document that pre-dates indoor plumbing is asinine. Originalism allows the justices to order a la carte and affirm the stuff they like and 86 the stuff they don’t simply by claiming the offending cases don’t adhere to the spirit of the constitution, whatever that means. The further the court drifts from public opinion at large, the closer it gets to the dreaded I word — illegitimate.

The legitimacy of the court shouldn’t be taken for granted. Legitimacy is, in a sense, all the court has. What happens if states start refusing to obey the court’s increasingly conservative rulings? There is no Supreme Court Strike Force. Andrew Jackson, speaking of the chief justice, once said, “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.” The more rights it strips away, the more protections it takes from protected classes, the closer the court gets to a crisis.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 282. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Democrats Push For Court-Packing After Controversial Supreme Court Rulings: Why The Proposal Is Likely DoomedProgressives amplified their calls to expand the Supreme Court in hopes of appointing more liberal justices to balance the scales of power after the conservative-majority court delivered several victories to Republicans last week.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Guns for Domestic Abusers, Agency Power Next Up at Supreme Court(Bloomberg) -- The Supreme Court is already planning to dive back into the culture wars and tackle the power of regulatory agencies in Washington in the slew of new cases it’s taking up in the fall. Most Read from BloombergChina Restricts Export of Chipmaking Metals in Clash With USRussian General Still Missing as Defense Chief Slams MutinyLazard Fires Senior Banker for Inappropriate Behavior at PartyBank of America Says it Started Talks With Fed After Stress Test ResultsMusk, Zuckerberg Lead a
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Web designer's 'customer' in Supreme Court case raising ethical and legal flagsThe Supreme Court said a Christian designer can refuse to make wedding websites for gay couples after her lawsuit pointed to a request from a man named “Stewart” and his husband-to-be. But Stewart says that never happened.
Source: FOX10Phoenix - 🏆 83. / 68 Read more »

If ‘Stewart’ was not a real customer, does it affect Supreme Court ruling on wedding website?The revelation has raised questions about how Lorie Smith’s case was allowed to proceed all the way to the nation’s highest court with such an apparent misrepresentation and whether the state of Co…
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »

Apple asks Supreme Court to overturn ruling in 'Fortnite' caseThree years after Epic Games sued Apple due to its App Store policies, the Cupertino firm will ask the US Supreme Court to undo an order.
Source: BGR - 🏆 234. / 63 Read more »

In 370 days, Supreme Court conservatives dash decades of abortion and affirmative action precedentsOverturning Roe v. Wade and affirmative action in higher education had been leading goals of the conservative legal movement for decades.
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »