NEW POLL REVEALS WHERE AMERICANS STAND ON SCOTUS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, STUDENT LOAN, RELIGIOUS FREEDOM DECISIONS
The reverberations of Biden’s debt cancellation program would surely have been felt for many years. But as important as these concerns are, the Supreme Court’s decision carries far more weight than merely addressing the direct and indirect costs of student debt cancellation plans. Biden v. Nebraska will likely affect numerous future executive actions taken by presidents and their executive branch departments, and not just those involving the Department of Education.
The primary legal battle in Biden v. Nebraska was not about student loan debt, but rather the authority of the executive branch to use vague wording in laws to enact sweeping reforms without the need for congressional action. The Biden administration attempted to argue, as the Obama administration and other liberal governments had in the past, that broad legislative language could be used to do just about anything the federal government wants.
This far-left view of lawmaking would open the door to seemingly endless abuses of power and expansions of government programs. For example, if Biden had prevailed in the case, who’s to say he wouldn’t have eventually canceled all student loan debt, or given every college student in America $10,000 in cash to help with living expenses? Surely, both of those reforms could also be called"modifications" of the law.Thankfully, the Supreme Court rejected this radical approach to rulemaking.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: njdotcom - 🏆 282. / 63 Read more »
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: FoxBusiness - 🏆 458. / 53 Read more »