Choosing your opponent: Why Democrats are bashing the Supreme Court now

  • 📰 FoxNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 74 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 33%
  • Publisher: 87%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

As the 2024 elections heat up, Democrats are looking to take on the Supreme Court to promote LGBTQ issues and student loans to push leftist policies.

to a page in their playbook which likely helped the party gain a seat in the Senate and nearly cling to control in the House in 2022. Theopinion on abortion last year emerged as a game changer. It energized progressives and pro-choice Democrats and independents. The ruling infused the polls with a stream of voters, serving as a political life preserver to the party.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez was critical of CNN for doing a town hall event with former President Trump. The Judiciary Act of 1789 created a Supreme Court comprised of six justices. But in 1801, Congress reduced the size of the Court to five justices. That was an effort to undercut President Thomas Jefferson from filling the Supreme Court with one of his nominees. Don’t forget that the House of Representatives elected Jefferson as president in what is known as a"contingent election" following a dispute over the Electoral College.

FDR accused the Supreme Court of an"arbitrary exercise of judicial power" when it came to opinions about banks and railroads. So the president hoped to change the Court by adding more youthful members who might align more closely with his political agenda."There is nothing novel or radical about this idea," said FDR, noting that Congress also changed the Court’s membership in 1869.

President Franklin Roosevelt today signed the G.I.Bill of Rights, which provides broad benefits for veterans of World War II. The ceremony was witnessed by members of the Senate and House and members of the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars. L to right, front row in rear of President: Senator Bennett Champ Clark of MO; Congressman J. Hardin Peterson of FL; Congressman John Rankin of MS; and Edith Nourse Rogers of MA. Leaning back over the President: Senator Walter F.George of GA.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 9. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Democrats Push For Court-Packing After Controversial Supreme Court Rulings: Why The Proposal Is Likely DoomedProgressives amplified their calls to expand the Supreme Court in hopes of appointing more liberal justices to balance the scales of power after the conservative-majority court delivered several victories to Republicans last week.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Democrats ramp up pressure on Biden to pack the Supreme Court after latest rulingsDemocrats in Congress are pressuring President Biden to pack the Supreme Court with liberal justices and impose term limits after recent rulings.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Opinion: The Supreme Court's just-ended term contained some surprising gifts for DemocratsWhen the justices didn't gut the Voting Rights Act, people cheered. The ripple effect got less play — it may allow Democrats to retake the House in 2024
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Putting the Supreme in the Supreme Court | ShenemanAll rise! It's mandatory.
Source: njdotcom - 🏆 282. / 63 Read more »

The Supreme Court Is Waging War on Black Women and GirlsCommentary: The Supreme Court is an engine of repression whose decisions on affirmative action, student debt relief, and abortion rights amount to a war on Black women and girls, writes Marley Dias
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »

Opinion | The Supreme Court Declares IndependenceFrom WSJopinion: We are in the throes of a full-scale American cultural counterrevolution enforced by a string of impeccable decisions from a Supreme Court intent on reviving the spirit of 1776, writes gerardtbaker
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »