Using the Supreme Court decision as a catalyst, Nguyen’s group is rallying the alumni of top colleges to press their alma maters to end the practice. The goal is to get graduates of the 30 schools to withhold donations until the policy ends. The schools include Harvard and the University of North Carolina, which were at the center of the court case, along with the rest of the Ivy League and the University of Southern California.
“It’s just low-hanging fruit,” she said. “People want something to do, and there’s a strong rationale to get rid of it.” In the hazy world of college admissions, it’s unclear exactly which schools provide a legacy boost and how much it helps. In California, where state law requires schools to disclose the practice, USC reported that 14% of last year’s admitted students had family ties to alumni or donors. Stanford reported a similar rate.
Supporters of the policy say it builds an alumni community and encourages donations. A 2022 study of an undisclosed college in the Northeast found that legacy students were more likely to make donations, but at a cost to diversity — the vast majority were white. Ivory Toldson went to college at Louisiana State University, but it wasn’t an option for his parents in the Jim Crow South.
In May, an AP-NORC poll found that few Americans think legacy admissions or donations should play much of a role in college admissions. Just 9% say it should be very important that a family member attended and 18% say it should be somewhat important. Likewise, only 10% say donations to the school should be very important and 17% say that should be somewhat important.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: seventeen - 🏆 412. / 53 Read more »
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »