Ilya Shapiro, a senior fellow and director of constitutional studies at the Manhattan Institute and author of "Canceling Justice: The Illiberal Takeover of Legal Education,"that although the court closed the door on racial discrimination with their decision, he expects litigation to continue as universities try to maintain the status quo that's existed for more than 45 years.
"But it's clear that the Supreme Court has no more constitutional patience for admissions officers' social engineering or university administrators' DEI posturing," Shapiro added.poll shows that Americans are willing to move past traditional affirmative action. It now falls to the higher education community to protect what we value: ensuring access to higher education for all students, promoting equity in education, and fostering vibrant university campuses characterized by the freedom to learn, teach, and conduct research.Erika George, a law professor at the University of Utah, told the Deseret News that she observed in the ruling that universities aren't banned from considering a student's personal experience related to race.
With that said, the American Association of University Professors, a union that represents professors across the country, said it will continue to fight against the ruling, according to a"It now falls to the higher education community to protect what we value: ensuring access to higher education for all students, promoting equity in education, and fostering vibrant university campuses characterized by the freedom to learn, teach, and conduct research," the statement said.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »