How college admissions will change in America after the Supreme Court knocked down affirmative action

  • 📰 MarketWatch
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 108 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 46%
  • Publisher: 97%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Colleges have defended affirmative action in part by arguing that achieving racial diversity is an important educational objective. Now, they will search for a new way to hold to that goal without running afoul of the Supreme Court’s decision.

College leaders have been girding themselves for the decision since October when the justices heard oral arguments in cases filed by Students for Fair Admissions challenging the use of race-conscious admissions policies at the University of North Carolina and Harvard University.

Roberts added: “At the same time, nothing prohibits universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected the applicant’s life, so long as that discussion is concretely tied to a quality of character or unique ability that the particular applicant can contribute to the university.”

“If the thing you care about is race then the thing that works best is race,” she said. “Everything else is a proxy. Every step removed that you do adds in an error.” Kim Cook, the chief executive officer of the National College Attainment Network, which works with colleges, community-based organizations, public school systems and others to increase the number of low-income and other underrepresented students in colleges, said her organization is encouraging colleges to look beyond the high schools and communities from which they typically recruit.

The University of California system has spent more than $500 million since 1998, shortly after affirmative action was banned in the state, on just one of its race-neutral efforts, programs to target students in disadvantaged schools for increased opportunities for college preparation and college planning, according to a friend of the court brief filed by the University of California in a previous affirmative action case.

“The reason institutions prioritize someone who has demonstrated interest is because it increases the yield,” Voight said, referring to the share of accepted students who decide to enroll at a college. Yield can be a factor in college rankings, Voight said, which may be why some schools feel pressure to give a leg up to students who show they’re interested in enrolling.

Research on Harvard admissions data that became available as part of the case, indicates that getting rid of preferences for legacies and athletes would decrease the number of white students admitted to the school with little change or increase in the number of Black, Hispanic and Asian American students admitted. Still, that increase in diversity isn’t enough to offset the decreases in diversity that would come from a ban on affirmative action.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 3. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rules that colleges must stop considering the race of applicants for admissionThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that colleges and universities must stop considering race in admissions, forcing institutions of higher education to look for new ways to achieve diverse student bodies.
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court rules that colleges must stop considering the race of applicants for admissionIn a 6-3 decision, the court struck down admissions plans at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, the nation’s oldest private and public colleges, respectively.
Source: wsfa12news - 🏆 338. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court rules colleges must stop considering for admissions, upending affirmative actionThe Supreme Court ruled Thursday that colleges and universities must stop considering race in admissions, forcing institutions of higher education to look for new ways to achieve diverse student bodies. In a 6-3 decision split along ideological grounds, the court’s conservative majority struck down admissions plans at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, the nation’s oldest private and public colleges, respectively. Writing…
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rules that colleges must stop considering the race of applicants for admissionBREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled that colleges and universities must stop considering race in admissions, forcing institutions of higher education to look for new ways to achieve diverse student bodies.
Source: abc15 - 🏆 263. / 63 Read more »

Colleges can’t use race to consider admissions, Supreme Court rulesIn a 6-3 decision, the court struck down affirmative-action admissions plans at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.
Source: PennLive - 🏆 463. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects affirmative action at colleges, says schools can't consider race in admissionThe Supreme Court's majority opinion said that both Harvard’s and UNC’s affirmative action programs “unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points.” Read more here:
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »