in college admissions, forcing institutions of higher education to look for new ways to achieve diverse student bodies.
The court’s conservative majority overturned admissions plans at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, the nation’s oldest private and public colleges, respectively. Chief Justice John Roberts said that for too long universities have “concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned but the color of their skin. Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice.”
In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the decision “rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress.”
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court news: Why 6-3 conservative court has Obama, Schumer, and Pelosi cheeringDemocrats are cheering for the conservative majority Supreme Court after a Tuesday ruling in Moore v. Harper, saying the rejection of the so-called independent state legislature theory marked a win for voting rights.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Summit County judge achieves re-certification from Ohio Supreme Court for Valor Court ProgramPresiding Judge Susan Baker Ross earned a final certificate from the Ohio Supreme Court's Commission on Specialized Dockets for the Valor Court.
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court outlaws affirmative action in college admissionsThe Supreme Court struck down affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina Thursday, ruling that both institutions were in violation of the Fourteenth Amen…
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects theory that would have meant radical changes to election rulesThe Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the theory that state legislatures have almost unlimited power to decide the rules for federal elections and draw partisan congressional maps without interference from state courts.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court rules state courts can play role in policing federal electionsBREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that North Carolina’s top court did not overstep its bounds in striking down a congressional districting plan. The case would have left state legislatures virtually unchecked in making rules for federal elections.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court rules against giving state legislatures unchecked control over federal electionsBREAKING: Supreme Court rules against giving state legislatures unchecked control over federal elections, ruling against Republicans in North Carolina fighting for a congressional district map that would heavily favor their candidates.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »