WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that North Carolina's top court did not overstep its bounds in striking down a congressional districting plan as excessively partisan under state law.
But Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court that"state courts retain the authority to apply state constitutional restraints when legislatures act under the power conferred upon them by the Elections Clause. But federal courts must not abandon their own duty to exercise judicial review." Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch would have dismissed the case because of the intervening North Carolina court action.
Listen now and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | RSS Feed | Omny Studio | All Of Our Podcasts Opponents of the idea, known as the independent legislature theory, had argued that the effects of a robust ruling for North Carolina Republicans could be much broader than just redistricting and exacerbate political polarization.
A court-drawn map produced seven seats for each party in last year's midterm elections in highly competitive North Carolina. Leading Republican lawmakers in North Carolina told the Supreme Court that the Constitution's"carefully drawn lines place the regulation of federal elections in the hands of state legislatures, Congress and no one else."
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court will decide whether Congress can tax wealthConservative Supreme Court will weigh in on whether Congress can tax so-called unrealized gains from foreign companies.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: dothaneagle - 🏆 337. / 59 Read more »
Source: fox13 - 🏆 550. / 51 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: cbsaustin - 🏆 595. / 51 Read more »
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »