Ohio Ballot Board Approves Language for 60% Amendment Proposal Along Party Lines, Again

Ohio Supreme Court ruling

. Their arguments accusing the measure’s ballot language of being improperly persuasive and omitting the status quo for comparison went nowhere with the supreme court majority.The Ohio Supreme Court majority directed the Ballot Board to make two changes. The most obvious had to do with how it described the number of signatures needed to get on the ballot.

In line with the court order, the new title distinguishes between qualifying for and passing a constitutional amendment. The ballot language states initiative petitions must be signed “by at least five percent of the electors of each county based on the total vote in the county for governor in the last preceding election.”

Ohio state Sen. Bill DeMora, D-Columbus, moved to change the language in line with McTigue’s suggestion. Before the vote, LaRose dismissed the changes, arguing “it’s substantially the same — accomplishes the same purpose as the proposed language.”After the hearing, LaRose downplayed the need for changes, describing them as “small revisions.” He said that, as it stands, there won’t be a problem preparing ballots and conducting an election in early August.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Ohio Supreme Court: ballot board must fix language describing August supermajority questionThe Ohio Supreme Court on Monday ordered a state panel back to work to fix language describing an August ballot proposal aimed at making it harder to amend the state's constitution.
Source: wsyx6 - 🏆 444. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court: Ohio ballot board must fix language describing August supermajority questionThe Ohio Supreme Court on Monday ordered a state panel back to work to fix language describing an August ballot proposal aimed at making it harder to amend the state’s constitution, after justices determined elements of the wording would mislead voters.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Ohio Supreme Court orders partial rewrite of ballot language for constitution issueThe court ordered the Ballot Board to redo some of the language and maintained other parts that opponents said are misleading.
Source: DispatchAlerts - 🏆 72. / 68 Read more »

Ohio Supreme Court says Issue 1 ballot language must be rewrittenOn Monday, the Ohio Supreme Court handed down a ruling that ordered the ballot language for Issue 1 to be rewritten.
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »

State Issue 1 ballot language must be rewritten, Ohio Supreme Court rulesThe Ohio Supreme Court on Monday told the state ballot board that it must rewrite summary language for State Issue 1 to remove an error describing new signature requirements if the issue passes in August.
Source: clevelanddotcom - 🏆 301. / 63 Read more »