Ohio Supreme Court: ballot board must fix language describing August supermajority question

  • 📰 wsyx6
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 31 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Ohio Supreme Court on Monday ordered a state panel back to work to fix language describing an August ballot proposal aimed at making it harder to amend the state's constitution.

was a partial victory for One Person One Vote, the campaign opposing Issue 1, which calls for raising the threshold for passing future constitutional amendments in Ohio from a simple majority to 60%.

The high court ruled unanimously that the ballot board was wrong to describe the measure as increasing the standards to qualify “any” constitutional amendment for the ballot. The ballot language also misdescribes the percentage of electors required in each county to qualify a citizen-led issue for the ballot. It's 5% of those who voted in the last gubernatorial election, not 5% of all voters in that county.

The Supreme Court's four-member Republican majority ruled that “elevating” could stay — on grounds that the other verbs suggested by opponents share overlapping definitions.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 444. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Ohio Supreme Court orders partial rewrite of ballot language for constitution issueThe court ordered the Ballot Board to redo some of the language and maintained other parts that opponents said are misleading.
Source: DispatchAlerts - 🏆 72. / 68 Read more »

Ohio Supreme Court says Issue 1 ballot language must be rewrittenOn Monday, the Ohio Supreme Court handed down a ruling that ordered the ballot language for Issue 1 to be rewritten.
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »

Why the Supreme Court Declined an Opportunity to Diminish the Voting Rights ActIn a new Q. & A., IChotiner speaks with ruthgreenwood about the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on Allen v. Milligan, which determined that Alabama’s redistricting had illegally diluted the power of Black voters.
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court endorses race-based districtingChief Justice John Roberts famously wrote in a 2006 political redistricting case that “it is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.” In a landmark redistricting decision on June 8, Roberts engaged in exactly this sordid business.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

US Supreme Court Kicks American Wetlands When They're DownIt appears the Court's right-wing majority wants to open the floodgates to polluters even as we continue to learn more about just how connected wetlands are to bigger bodies of water and also to our entire way of life​.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Voting Rights Decision an Important, If Qualified, WinWhile Allen v. Milligan should be celebrated as a victory for fair representation, it cannot be an excuse for congressional inaction.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »