was a partial victory for One Person One Vote, the campaign opposing Issue 1, which calls for raising the threshold for passing future constitutional amendments in Ohio from a simple majority to 60%.
The high court ruled unanimously that the ballot board was wrong to describe the measure as increasing the standards to qualify “any” constitutional amendment for the ballot. The ballot language also misdescribes the percentage of electors required in each county to qualify a citizen-led issue for the ballot. It's 5% of those who voted in the last gubernatorial election, not 5% of all voters in that county.
The Supreme Court's four-member Republican majority ruled that “elevating” could stay — on grounds that the other verbs suggested by opponents share overlapping definitions.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: DispatchAlerts - 🏆 72. / 68 Read more »
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
US Supreme Court Kicks American Wetlands When They're DownIt appears the Court's right-wing majority wants to open the floodgates to polluters even as we continue to learn more about just how connected wetlands are to bigger bodies of water and also to our entire way of life.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court Voting Rights Decision an Important, If Qualified, WinWhile Allen v. Milligan should be celebrated as a victory for fair representation, it cannot be an excuse for congressional inaction.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »