Supreme Court endorses race-based districting

  • 📰 dcexaminer
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 14 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 9%
  • Publisher: 94%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Chief Justice John Roberts famously wrote in a 2006 political redistricting case that “it is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.” In a landmark redistricting decision on June 8, Roberts engaged in exactly this sordid business.

Because of Roberts’s 5-4 decision in Allen v. Milligan, Alabama, race relations, and constitutional law all may fundamentally be harmed.Against separate, spirited dissents from Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, who were joined in whole or part by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, the Supreme Court majority invalidated Alabama’s congressional district maps, essentially ordering the state to produce two “black-majority” districts among its seven.

As Thomas noted, Alabama’s population distribution is such that the only way to create a second black-majority congressional district is to abandon race-neutral principles and make race the predominant “precondition” for figuring out where to draw district lines.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rules Alabama's congressional maps violate Voting Rights ActBlack voters had challenged the redrawing of the election maps.
Source: 6abc - 🏆 250. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court voting rights ruling stuns minority voters, who hope it expands their representationThis week's Supreme Court decision ordering Alabama to redraw its congressional districts was seen by many minority lawmakers and voting rights activists as a stunning victory with the potential to become a major stepping stone for undoing political maps that dilute the strength of communities of color. Hank Sanders, a former Alabama state lawmaker who has long been politically active in the state, knew there would be a decision since the court heard arguments in the case last fall. “I was afraid they were going to go ahead and wipe out section 2,' he said, referring to the part of the Voting Rights Act at stake in the Alabama case.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Dutch Supreme Court orders museum artifacts borrowed from Crimea returned to UkraineThe Supreme Court of the Netherlands has ordered that a Dutch museum’s trove of historical treasures from Crimea be sent to Ukraine.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »

Dutch Supreme Court orders museum artifacts borrowed from Crimea returned to UkraineThe Supreme Court of the Netherlands on Friday ordered that a Dutch museum's trove of historical treasures from Crimea be sent to Ukraine, upholding a lower court ruling that the 300 artifacts are part of Ukraine's cultural heritage.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Half of people disapprove of affirmative action as Supreme Court opinions loom: PollA recent poll found that 50% of adults disapprove of higher education institutions practicing affirmative action when admitting students. Before SCOTUS's term ends in late June, two related opinions will be released by the court.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Opinion | The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Act ruling is no victory for democracyOpinion by By Melissa Murray and Steve Vladeck: The court's decision in the Alabama redistricting case must be considered in the broader context.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »