Illinois bucks Supreme Court, defends ban on assault weapons sales as lawful

  • 📰 WashTimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 46 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The state of Illinois on Monday told the Supreme Court it shouldn’t halt a ban on the sale of assault weapons in the city of Naperville, arguing that a gun shop and gun rights group aren’t harmed by the prohibition.

In a 44-page filing, Illinois Solicitor General Kwame Raoul said the high court shouldn’t block the law from being enforced while the case continues in lower courts, arguing that it’s unclear if Supreme Court precedent applies to assault weapons.

The high court ruled last year in New York Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen that gun control laws are lawful only if they are consistent with the nation’s history and traditions dating back to the founding of the country. His argument came after a gun rights group asked the Supreme Court last week to block the city’s ban on assault weapons, saying it runs afoul of the high court’s precedent in Bruen.

A federal court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit declined to block enforcement of the law, prompting the National Association for Gun Rights to ask the high court to get involved.“Many of the lower courts did not get the message. This action is a case in point. In the teeth of this Court’s precedents, the district court refused to address the evidence that the arms banned by the challenged laws are held by millions of law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 235. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Wisconsin Supreme Court won't order ivermectin use for COVIDWisconsin’s conservative-controlled Supreme Court ruled a hospital couldn't be forced to give a deworming drug to a patient with COVID-19, saying a county judge did not cite a legal basis for ordering the facility to administer ivermectin
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »

Six of the most anticipated Supreme Court cases we could get decisions on by July 4Here are six of the most anticipated cases the Supreme Court will release opinions on in the coming weeks after hearing arguments in several high-profile issues.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Seven cases to watch as Supreme Court session nears its endUntil now, the Supreme Court has been handing down decisions at a historically slow rate this session, but that will soon change as it filters through its outstanding cases ahead of the summer.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Asa Hutchinson calls for 'clear set of rules' for Supreme Court justicesFormer Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R) called for a clear set of rules to be set for the conduct of the Supreme Court.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

The Tale of the Only U.S. Supreme Court Justice to be ImpeachedTo understand Clarence Thomas' possible future, we looked to the past.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »