Supreme Court sets up a direct hit on the administrative state

Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.

The case concerns commercial fishing companies that object to a rule promulgated by the National Marine Fisheries Service. Under the rule, fishing companies must pay the monitors legally required to observe these companies and make sure they are in compliance with federal regulations. The fishing companies argue the agency does not have the authority to make the regulation.That all might seem rather mundane, even boring, to anyone not involved in the lawsuit.

This deference has created many problems, including stripping the courts of the judicial power to which they have a constitutional right. While courts often find statutes vague, judges have nearly never found agency regulations unreasonable. Thus, most binding interpretations of congressional laws end up coming from the administrators. “Rather than say what the law is,” Justice Gorsuch recently complained regardingThis is part of a broader, deeper problem.

The other constitutional branches have gone along with this fundamental reordering of our political structure as well. Congress has delegated its legislative power to these agencies through broad, vague laws that leave to the bureaucrats most decision-making. And the presidency has permitted independent agencies to operate outside that office’s duty to ensure proper law enforcement. Together, the three constitutional branches have created and bowed to a monster unknown to our governing document.

Deference as an unconstitutional abdication of the judicial power the Constitution vests in them, not in bureaucrats. There still might be room for some level of deference to bureaucrats on deeply technical matters, especially on matters of health and the environment. But the court must push the judicial branch to work much harder to interpret the law for itself, and Congress to dedicate itself to the important task of nuanced, thoughtful lawmaking.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Four House seats Democrats could lose following state Supreme Court gerrymandering decisionNorth Carolina Republicans' 2024 path has been cleared following the state Supreme Court's recent decision to overturn a past ruling that disallowed partisan gerrymandering, paving the way for the Republicans to create a map that more heavily favors their party.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Trump suit against New York Times thrown out by state Supreme CourtThe New York Supreme Court tossed out a lawsuit from Donald Trump against the nytimes. The Court determined that Trump's claims that the outlet had engaged in an 'insidious plot' to obtain his personal records failed as a matter of 'constitutional law.'
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Wisconsin AG sues over abortion ban in case that could end up before state Supreme CourtA Wisconsin judge will hear arguments in a lawsuit challenging the state's 174-year-old abortion ban, setting up a high-stakes courtroom showdown that could make its way to the newly reconfigured, liberal-leaning state Supreme Court.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Lee defends Supreme Court, Justice Thomas at hearingIn a committee hearing, Utah Sen. Mike Lee said he believes there's a coordinated campaign against Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices in order to reduce trust in the court.
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court: ‘We Wear Gold Crowns Now’WASHINGTON—In a rare unanimous opinion that did not pertain to any case pending before them, the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court issued a brief but official order Wednesday that stated, “We wear gold crowns now.” “In addition to our long black robes—which henceforth will be woven from the finest velvet and…
Source: TheOnion - 🏆 724. / 51 Read more »

Jim Jordan demands answers on why more Supreme Court protesters weren't arrested.JudiciaryGOP Chair Jim_Jordan demanded answers about alleged directives given to US Marshals Service ahead of protests at the SCOTUS justices’ residences last year. Jordan cited material that encouraged Marshals to refrain from detaining protesters.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »