, but is now asking lawyers from both sides to submit whether they plan to refile their cases in light of the legislative rule change.that amended Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 65A in two ways potentially material to whether interlocutory review continues to be warranted," Pearce wrote. "HJR2 modified the standard to grant an injunction and provided a mechanism for a court to reconsider some previously granted injunctions.
Specifically, Pearce asked if "in the wake of any decision this court may reach," either of the parties plan to file a new motion for an injunction or a request to reconsider the existing injunction with the lower court. "The Supreme Court in this recent order is essentially asking — now that the rules have changed on how preliminary injunctions are granted and this is retroactive — is there any point in reviewing that old injunction under the old rules?" Brown told KSL.com. "Is it a good use of time? Or is it not important for justice?"
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: fox13 - 🏆 550. / 51 Read more »
Supreme court declines oil companies' request to shift climate suits to federal courtThe U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear arguments from oil companies on why a...
Source: HoustonChron - 🏆 609. / 51 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: aldotcom - 🏆 82. / 68 Read more »