Alaska Supreme Court, in landmark ruling, says partisan gerrymandering violates state constitution

, the board approved an interim map last year for November’s general election that kept Eagle River intact in one Senate district.

Alaska Federation of Natives attorney Nicole Borromeo, who was in the minority of board members opposed to giving Eagle River two Senate seats, warned at the time that a court would likely rule that was partisan gerrymandering. In an interview Friday, she said she supported the interim map because it comported with the constitution, but she was interested in hearing if other board members wanted to reopen the map for additional drafting.

Kendall said the court’s reading of the equal protection doctrine meant that there would effectively need to be a level playing field between communities. Maps could not be drawn to give more political power to residents of Eagle River over those of Muldoon, he said, referring to one map struck down by the court.that partisan redistricting was a political matter and beyond the reach of federal courts.

Redrawing the state’s political map is constitutionally required to take place every 10 years after the release of U.S. Census data, so that population changes are accurately reflected in new boundaries for 40 state House districts and 20 Senate districts. Begich said to his knowledge, that was clearest prohibition against partisan gerrymandering issued by any state supreme court.

The state redistricting board has five members who are appointed to serve until a final map has been approved. Two members are appointed by the governor, and one each are appointed by the House speaker, the Senate president and the chief justice of the Alaska Supreme Court.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

AOC Rebukes Alito 'Tantrum' and\u00a0 'Highly Politicized' Supreme Court'In our system of checks and balances, SCOTUS’s reckless behavior warrants a check from the legislative and executive branches,' says AOC. This is not unprecedented, it's how our system is designed to avert tyranny.'
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Democrats breathe temporary sigh of relief after Supreme Court order on abortion pillDemocrats express cautious optimism and Republicans voice frustration after the Supreme Court's decision to allow the abortion pill mifepristone to remain widely available.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court Rules to Protect Access to the Abortion Pill — For NowThe court’s ruling means mifepristone will continue to be legal as the case makes its way through the courts.
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court justices ‘at each other’s throats’ as abortion pill access upheld legal expert saysThe Supreme Court blocked in full a decision by Texas-based U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk made on April 7 that invalidated the Food and Drug Administration’s longtime approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito publicly dissented from the decision. Joy Reid and her panel discuss.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

The Supreme Court fight over an abortion pill: What’s next?Nothing will change for now. That’s what the Supreme Court said Friday evening about access to a widely used abortion pill.
Source: SpectrumNews1TX - 🏆 333. / 59 Read more »

What’s next for abortion pill after Supreme Court’s orderNothing will change for now. That’s what the Supreme Court said Friday evening about access to a widely used abortion pill. A court case that began in Texas has sought to roll back Food and D…
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »