PolitiFact - Why doesn’t the Supreme Court have a formal code of ethics?

  • 📰 PolitiFact
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 49 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 71%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

ProPublica’s reporting revealing Justice Clarence Thomas accepted tens of thousands of dollars in gifts from a Texas billionaire without disclosing them has renewed calls for the U.S. Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics. So far there isn’t one.

Federal laws, some of which were recently tightened, require Supreme Court justices to report gifts valued at more than a few hundred dollars. But there are no official ethics standards for the Supreme Court as there are for lower courts.said that across two decades, Thomas and his wife, Ginni, took gifts from Harlan Crow, a conservative billionaire based in Dallas, that included private jet and yacht travel to destinations including the Adirondacks and Indonesia.

Justices and other officials must, by federal law, disclose the details of most real estate sales exceeding $1,000.American Bar Association "How do you explain to the American people when they discover that every part of our government structure, all the other agencies, have codes of conduct, but the United States Supreme Court does not?" said James Williams, the Washington state delegate to the American Bar Association, who introduced a resolution to have the court adopt an ethics code.

"I think would send a message that the justices are not above the law, nor are they too important or special to adopt the types of rules and practices that govern the conduct of every other judge in the country," Roth said.in 1973. It asks judges to uphold canons regarding integrity and independence; avoiding impropriety; fairness and impartiality and extrajudicial activities. It also asks judges to refrain from political activity.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 17. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Clarence Thomas' lavish gifts remind us: highest court shouldn't have lowest standards (Editorial)Clarence Thomas' lavish gifts remind us: highest court shouldn't have lowest ethical standards (Editorial) Agreed. AGREED!!!! Ethics, Rules, and Standards are vestiges of White Supremacy.
Source: HoustonChron - 🏆 609. / 51 Read more »

Harlan Crow, Clarence Thomas and a diminished Supreme CourtThe U.S. Supreme Court has long put off adopting its own code of ethics, even as federal judges in lower courts are bound by one. Yet Justice Clarence Thomas... Interesting. Now do the expose’ on Hunter, Joe, and the influence for sale in China. I’ll hang up and listen. Thomas cannot be trusted. Very sad.
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »

Justice Department seeks relief from Supreme Court to protect abortion pill accessThe abortion pill mifepristone will remain available in the United States for now but with significant restrictions, including a requirement for in-person doctor visits to obtain the drug, a federal appeals court ruled late on Wednesday.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Justice Department to take abortion pill fight to Supreme Court: GarlandBREAKING: The Justice Department will take the fight over the abortion pill mifepristone to the Supreme Court after an appeals court ruling that would restrict access. gee, i wonder how this anti abortion purpose built republican majority supreme court will rule. it's a complete mystery. Clothes hangers are the old way BaddCompani
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Justice Department to ask Supreme Court to intervene in abortion pill rulingAttorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement the Justice Department 'strongly disagrees' with the decision from an appeals court. 76% of abortions are of black children. Keep it legal!!! Thanks Democrats! 😁 Can’t count on SCOTUS to rule with the right decision. They’ll fuck this up too. DOJ is so political left!!! Litigation means FDA not always right & now women will be closely supervised by Docs when taking pill.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

Justice Department to take abortion pill fight to Supreme CourtThe Justice Department announced Thursday it will ask the Supreme Court to let the administration continue to distribute the abortion pill via mail and through 10 weeks of pregnancy after those regulations were halted by a federal appeals court. .TheDemocrats need their stealth eugenics program (Abortion) now more than ever. They believe it when Malthusians and Misanthropes (AKA Climate Change scientists) state that ClimateEmergency is PEOPLE !. You mean the continued murdering of innocent baby humans. “…the FDA’s scientific judgement…” How’d d that work out the past 3 years? The D.C. clown show just continues with a middle finger to the public
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »