, Murdoch argued that Fox as a network did not endorse the claims, but that some of its commentators — Maria Bartiromo, Lou Dobbs, Jeanine Pirro and Sean Hannity — at times did.claims made by Trump and his allies
Dominion’s lawyers say Fox is arguing that it has no legal responsibility for broadcasting even the most horrible allegations, knowing they are false, as long as they are deemed newsworthy. Still, Levine said, Dominion has the strongest defamation case he's seen in 40 years of being involved in the topic.
There is sentiment in Republican circles that the Sullivan standard goes too far in protecting news organizations.
Dominion should be suing those behind FoxNews tweets- one of the biggest disseminators of inaccurate information and straight up lies.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Fox libel defense at odds with top GOP presidential foesThe network is relying on a nearly 60-year-old Supreme Court ruling that makes it difficult to successfully sue media organizations for libel.
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »
Fox libel defense at odds with top GOP presidential foesFox News is on an unlikely collision course with two leading contenders for the Republican presidential nomination over the rights of journalists. I'm willing to show 10 lucky people on how to earn 0.92 BTC ($10,000)and more daily. No withdrawal fee You don't get to send funds to anyone Interested please PM.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Fox libel defense at odds with top GOP presidential foesNEW YORK (AP) — Fox News is on an unlikely collision course with two leading contenders for the Republican presidential nomination over the rights of journalists. In defending itself against a massive defamation lawsuit over how it covered false claims surrounding the 2020 presidential election, the network is relying on a nearly 60-year-old Supreme Court ruling that makes it difficult to successfully sue media organizations for libel. Current libel law requires plaintiffs to prove that a news organization acted with reckless disregard for the truth. Fox is using that standard to defend its actions that promoted false claims of voter fraud. Fox had a reckless disregard for the truth because they knew the truth, they knew they were lying & they did it anyway. And in doing so, Fox played into the hands of foreign adversaries & other enemies of our republic. Top GOP whatever is usually at odds with reality. More force issues than find solutions. It's kind of a shame. We need far greater numbers solution wise. We have enough forcing going on.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Fox libel defense at odds with top GOP presidential foesA $1.6 billion lawsuit against Fox News for its coverage of false claims surrounding the 2020 presidential election isn’t the only thing putting pressure on the standard for U.S. libel law. T… Did you ever cover the story about the Pfizer director for research stating on camera that they are developing new strains of Covid? Way to keep you eyes on the important issues, DP. Lol Sweet delicious infighting in the GOP warns my soul.
Source: denverpost - 🏆 13. / 72 Read more »