Fox libel defense at odds with top GOP presidential foes

NEW YORK — .

Eye-catching evidence has emerged from court filings in recent weeks revealing a split screen between what Fox was portraying to its viewers about the false claims of election fraud and what hosts and executives were saying about them behind the scenes. “Sydney Powell is lying,” Fox News host Tucker Carlson said in a text to a producer, referencing one of the attorneys pushing the claims for Trump.

In one example of how the law was applied, editors at the Times acknowledged last year that an editorial mistakenly linked former Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin’s rhetoric to an Arizona mass shooting. Palin lost her libel suit because she couldn’t prove the newspaper erred without concern for the truth.

“My wish is that the parties would settle and this case would go away,” said Jane Kirtley, director of the Silha Center for the Study of Media Ethics and the Law at the University of Minnesota. “I don’t see any good coming out of it.”Dominion says Fox was, in effect, torn between the truth that Joe Biden legitimately won the race and pleasing viewers who wanted to believe Trump’s lies.

Dominion’s lawyers say Fox is arguing that it has no legal responsibility for broadcasting even the most horrible allegations, knowing they are false, as long as they are deemed newsworthy. George Freeman, executive director of the Media Law Resource Center, said Fox should cite a lesser-known “neutral reportage” standard that dates back to a court case from the 1970s. It holds that news organizations should not be discouraged from reporting something newsworthy even if there are serious doubts about the truth, as long as that information comes from responsible and prominent sources.

Sweet delicious infighting in the GOP warns my soul.

Did you ever cover the story about the Pfizer director for research stating on camera that they are developing new strains of Covid? Way to keep you eyes on the important issues, DP. Lol

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Fox libel defense at odds with top GOP presidential foesThe network is relying on a nearly 60-year-old Supreme Court ruling that makes it difficult to successfully sue media organizations for libel.
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »

Fox libel defense at odds with top GOP presidential foesFox News is on an unlikely collision course with two leading contenders for the Republican presidential nomination over the rights of journalists. I'm willing to show 10 lucky people on how to earn 0.92 BTC ($10,000)and more daily. No withdrawal fee You don't get to send funds to anyone Interested please PM.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Fox libel defense at odds with top GOP presidential foesNEW YORK (AP) — Fox News is on an unlikely collision course with two leading contenders for the Republican presidential nomination over the rights of journalists. In defending itself against a massive defamation lawsuit over how it covered false claims surrounding the 2020 presidential election, the network is relying on a nearly 60-year-old Supreme Court ruling that makes it difficult to successfully sue media organizations for libel. Current libel law requires plaintiffs to prove that a news organization acted with reckless disregard for the truth. Fox is using that standard to defend its actions that promoted false claims of voter fraud. Fox had a reckless disregard for the truth because they knew the truth, they knew they were lying & they did it anyway. And in doing so, Fox played into the hands of foreign adversaries & other enemies of our republic. Top GOP whatever is usually at odds with reality. More force issues than find solutions. It's kind of a shame. We need far greater numbers solution wise. We have enough forcing going on.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »