“Would Google collapse, and the internet be destroyed,” Alito asked a Google attorney on Tuesday, “if YouTube and therefore Google were potentially liable” for the content its users posted? Alito’s question aimed to cut through the jargon and theatrics of a nearly three-hour debate over whether YouTube can be sued for algorithmically recommending videos created by the terrorist group ISIS.
” Threats to comment sections, Craigslist, even Wikipedia Exactly how the internet may change if the Supreme Court rules against the tech industry depends heavily on the specifics of that hypothetical ruling, and how expansive or narrowly tailored it is.
SCOTUS doesn't have the power to re-shape anything. That's the legislative branch. All they can determine if it's constitutional or not.
HeatherThomasAF The Daily Podcast from nytimes mikiebarb had a really good episode about this case on Thursday.
I can give up the internet
Fake panic. The court won't get in the way of the tech company's profits
OnlineSafetyBill UK
they kind of already said they won't. thankfully.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
How CNN's interview with Osama bin Laden became Supreme Court Big Tech flashpointAllegations that Twitter's hosting of unrelated content on its platform contributed to an Islamic State terrorist attack prompted Supreme Court justices to ask parties on Wednesday about what liability a business would have for dealing with Osama bin Laden. Bullshit. It's the government's job to stop terrorist attacks, not private companies. By making companies liable, it forces them to expand censorship, which is the opposite of what the Supreme Court should be doing. They should be prohibiting social media companies from censoring
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Opinion | Wisconsin’s Supreme Court primary signals Democrats’ strengthOpinion by Jennifer Rubin: Wisconsin’s Supreme Court primary signals Democrats’ strength
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Death penalty case divides Trump Supreme Court JusticesJustice Brett Kavanaugh broke with fellow conservatives to join Justice Sonia Sotomayor's majority opinion. Almost like all 9 SC justices aren’t as biased as some like to presume Amazing She must have bought him beers!😂 This should surprise no one. The conservatives on the court are not a 'block' as the liberals are but rather think and rule based on thier own findings of law. Personally I don't think the court should have taken the case at all but then I am not a lawyer so what do I know
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Liberal, Conservative Set to Square Off in Wisconsin's Supreme Court ElectionA liberal and a conservative are set to face off for an open Supreme Court seat in Wisconsin, a key swing state. See the potential biases and similarities in reports from wsj, cnn and dcexaminer:
Source: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court seems to favor tech giants in terror caseThe Supreme Court seems skeptical of a lawsuit trying to hold social media companies responsible for a terrorist attack at a Turkish nightclub that killed 39 people
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to 'Unconstitutional' Arkansas Anti-BDS Law'The struggle for collective liberation requires global solidarity and economic pressure,' said RepRahida after SCOTUS declines to hear an appeal of Arkansas' anti-BDS law. 'Today's decision is a travesty, but the people will not be silenced.' Fkn pathetic
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »