"Thrilled to report that it looks like we won the Arizona death penalty case I argued at the U.S. Supreme Court in November," he said in a tweet.
Yes, it is a win. Justice Sotomayor says the Arizona Supreme Court adopted a novel view of the law to try to deny death row inmates relief. Justice Barrett dissents, joined by Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch. Justice Sotomayor's majority opinionIn 2005, John Montenegro Cruz was convicted of first-degree murder for killing a police officer and was sentenced to death in a jury trial.
During his trial, Cruz asked that the jury be told that he would be ineligible for parole if he was given a life sentence. Knowing that Cruz could never be released from prison may have made the jury less inclined to impose the death penalty. But the judge denied Cruz's request.Simmons v. South Carolina
, the Supreme Court held that defendants have a constitutional right to inform the jury that they will be ineligible for parole if they serve a life sentence instead of being executed.' holding" and said the Arizona Supreme Court repeatedly made mistakes in a series of cases regarding this issue. People wait in line outside the US Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on February 21, 2023, to hear oral arguments in two cases that test Section 230, the law that provides tech companies a legal shield over what their users post online. Donald Trump appointees on the Supreme Court were divided on a decision in an Arizona death penalty case Wednesday., Arizona still declined to inform juries of a defendant's ineligibility for parole.
All major crimes should be punishable by death?
This should surprise no one. The conservatives on the court are not a 'block' as the liberals are but rather think and rule based on thier own findings of law. Personally I don't think the court should have taken the case at all but then I am not a lawyer so what do I know
She must have bought him beers!😂
Almost like all 9 SC justices aren’t as biased as some like to presume Amazing
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Ketanji Brown Jackson calls out colleagues' refusal to hear criminal caseThe Supreme Court likes to act as if it can't be bothered with criminal matters. Well, Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor have a little reminder. (via Deadline: Legal Blog) She's disgusting mprice0017 Evidently the Adults have decided to enter the room. What's a woman?
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Forget Girl Scout cookies, these girls earn badges by learning about social justice and equalityFrom afar, the group looks like other scouting troops. They wear berets and vests with badges. But each badge they earn is radical. For example, Radical Love or Radical Bodies. That’s kinda creepy just sayin You can almost foresee trouble with the law down the line for these kids. Where the white kids at
Source: abc7newsbayarea - 🏆 529. / 51 Read more »
Dem Leaders Urged to Mark Bloody Sunday by Acting on Voting Rights, Economic Justice'Selma is sacred ground. It is, in a very real sense, the delivery room where the possibility of a true democracy was born. It is no place to play or to be for political pretense. Either you're serious or not. If you're coming, come on Sunday, the actual day of remembrance. If you're coming, come wi
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »
Supporters of San Antonio Justice Charter accuse city attorney Andy Segovia of undermining democracyActivists said Segovia's comment that their cannabis-decriminalization ballot initiative is 'unenforceable' is an attempt to thwart its success at the ballot box. SanAntonio SATX SanAntonioTX CannabisNews CannabisReform Texas CannabisCommunity
Source: SAcurrent - 🏆 607. / 51 Read more »
SA Justice Charter supporters call city attorney’s comments on ballot initiative “unethical”Supporters of a San Antonio ballot initiative meant to decriminalize marijuana possession and abortion in the Alamo City say the city attorney’s public warnings about its enforceability are “unethical” and “immoral.” What was unethical was the ACT4SA’s tactics to get signatures on the petition, misrepresenting what the petition was truly attempting to accomplish. Great, so SA can turn into every othe blue city in the country with more homeless drug addicts…and we mustn’t forget the right to murder babies…evil people! State law is above local law.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
Rough Justice: ‘84 Is Set To Be Released In Mid-MarchGet ready to bring justice to the streets, '80s style! DaedalicEntertainment will release RoughJustice84 for PC via Steam next month.
Source: bleedingcool - 🏆 20. / 69 Read more »