The Supreme Court on Tuesday is set to hear oral arguments in the first of two cases this week with the potential to reshape how online platforms handle speech and content moderation.
According to the plaintiffs in the case — the family of Nohemi Gonzalez, who was killed in a 2015 ISIS attack in Paris — YouTube’s targeted recommendations violated a US antiterrorism law by helping to radicalize viewers and promote ISIS’s worldview. “I just don’t want my daughter’s life to be washed out like that. I want something to be done,” said Beatriz Gonzalez, Nohemi’s mother, in an interview with CNN. “We’re searching for justice. Somebody has to be responsible for what happened. Not only to me, but to many other families that have lost their loved ones.”
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court to weigh Google and Twitter internet free speech policiesFree speech access to the internet could be dramatically transformed, with the Supreme Court set to hear a high-stakes pair of oral arguments. Don't forget facebooks ' fact checkers'.... You're going to do everything you can to pretend that you didn't lie to your viewers, and you continue to lie, because you know the game was rigged in conservative media's favor: About time.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Google Case Heads to Supreme Court With Powerful Internet Shield Law at StakeGoogle goes before the Supreme Court this week to defend what’s seen as a pillar of the online economy—one that is also blamed for a proliferation of harmful content If you haven't heard much from Iran these days, it's because the internet connection has reached an all time low followed by the government disruption on mobile data access. We are still fighting, we won't be silenced. IranRevolution Is this accurate news or is it false ? Nothing will happen.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Google faces Supreme Court in case that could decide future of Section 230Open arguments before the nine justices are scheduled to begin on Tuesday. looks like the right-wing will finally get their FedSoc (federalist society) supreme court to destroy the internet, because of their fictious aggrieved feelings May that young woman and her family have Justice. Section 230 needs to be repealed. May that young woman and her family get the Justice they deserve. Get rid of Section 230. There is no reason for seditious ISIS material to reach our shores and be accessible under ANY circumstances.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »
Supreme Court to hear arguments on Google and Twitter’s liability for terrorists’ online postingsThe Supreme Court will hear arguments this week in a pair of cases about the legal liability of tech platforms like Google and Twitter for content posted by terrorists.
Source: FoxBusiness - 🏆 458. / 53 Read more »
Two Supreme Court cases could upend the rules of the internet | EngadgetTwo Supreme Court cases could upend the rules of the internet
Source: engadget - 🏆 276. / 63 Read more »