Big Tech's future is up to a Supreme Court that doesn't understand it

  • 📰 axios
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 53 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The firestorm over Big Tech and content moderation is coming to a head at the Supreme Court. Some experts fear it's a job the court simply isn’t equipped to do well.

The firestorm over Big Tech and content moderation is coming to a head at the Supreme Court — but some experts fear it's a job the court simply isn’t equipped to do well.The court has historically not been great at grappling with new technology. As it dives into the political battle over social-media algorithms, there's a real fear that the justices could end up creating more controversies than they solve.

The implications of such a decision may not be fully apparent for years, even to the engineers who work on those products.it's doing one thing and it's actually doing something very different,” said Evelyn Douek, a law professor at Stanford who specializes in tech law. “It’s ill-matched to the problem.

"There is a valid concern that the Court may simply not understand nor appreciate the technical complexities that drive the modern web,"The Supreme Court is an inherently slow-moving institution that tries to solve problems mainly by searching for one broad principle that can last forever. And that's simply hard to square with complex, evolving technology.All the way back in 1979, the court ruled that police don’t need a warrant to obtain a list of every phone number you’ve called.

But it’s not that hard to see how nine lawyers in a room in 2023 might not foresee the future of content algorithms, just as nine lawyers in a room in 1979 didn’t know the scope of the precedent they ended up setting.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Again with a reference to “experts”. So many topics and so many experts, but they are always unnamed and seem to operate in a vacuum. The media throws that term around like throw away our money. Think they’ll ever have an EXPERTS convention?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 302. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Biden and Republican senators join forces in attack on Big Tech at Supreme CourtPresident Biden and some of his most prominent Republican adversaries in Congress have become allies, of sorts, in an upcoming Supreme Court showdown between Big Tech and its critics. Joe biden working across the aisle with HawleyMO & tedcruz to take down big tech censorship is awesome fbi big tech and leftist media Like nbc Claimed hunters laptop was russia dis info, That was all a Lie, 17% of voters said if they knew the TRUTH they wouldn't have voted for biden [who was selling favors to other countries for the hiring of hunter] That's Election Interference
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Five big cases the Supreme Court will hear over the next four weeksThe Supreme Court over the next 30 days will hear arguments in five of the most interesting and high-stakes cases on the docket.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs liability shield for internet giantsA lawsuit against YouTube from the family of an American college student who was killed by Islamic State gunmen in Paris in 2015 is at the center of a closely watched Supreme Court case being argued Tuesday
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs liability shield for internet giantsWASHINGTON (AP) — Islamic State gunmen killed American college student Nohemi Gonzalez as she sat with friends in a Paris bistro in 2015, one of several attacks on a Friday night in the French capital that left 130 people dead. This title has far too many words for my boomer brain to parse. “But nothing in the suit links the attackers who killed Gonzalez to videos on YouTube, and the lack of a connection could make it hard to prove the company did anything wrong.” From the bottom of the article. Keep digging, we need to find some reason to limit free speech.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »