Supreme Court weighs liability shield for internet giants

  • 📰 WOKVNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 88 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 39%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A lawsuit against YouTube from the family of an American college student who was killed by Islamic State gunmen in Paris in 2015 is at the center of a closely watched Supreme Court case being argued Tuesday

FILE - Reynaldo Gonzalez cries while remembering his daughter Nohemi Gonzalez, who was killed by Islamic State gunmen in Paris, at her funeral at the Calvary Chapel in Downey, Calif., Dec. 4, 2015. A lawsuit against YouTube from the family of Nohemi Gonzalez is at the center of a closely watched Supreme Court case being argued Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2023.

A win for Gonzalez's family could wreak havoc on the internet, say Google and its many allies. Yelp, Reddit, Microsoft, Craigslist, Twitter and Facebook are among the companies warning that searches for jobs, restaurants and merchandise could be restricted if those social media platforms had to worry about being sued over the recommendations they provide and their users want.senior vice president and head of YouTube.

Her daughter was a 23-year-old senior at California State University, Long Beach, who was spending a semester in Paris studying industrial design. Her last communication with her mother was a mundane exchange about money via Facebook, two days before the attacks, Gonzalez said. The law was drafted in response to a state court decision that held an internet company could be liable for a post by one of its users in an online forum. The law's basic purpose was “to protect Internet platforms’ ability to publish and present user-generated content in real time, and to encourage them to screen and remove illegal or offensive content,” its authors, Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and former Rep. Christopher Cox, R-Calif., wrote in a Supreme Court filing.

Mohan said YouTube is able to keep people from seeing almost anything that violates the company's rules, including violent, extremist content. Just 1 video in 1,000 makes it past the company's screeners, he said. “Paring back the sweeping immunity courts have read into Section 230 would not necessarily render defendants liable for online misconduct. It simply would give plaintiffs a chance to raise their claims in the first place. Plaintiffs still must prove the merits of their cases, and some claims will undoubtedly fail,” Thomas wrote.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 247. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

As U.S. Supreme Court weighs YouTube's algorithms, 'litigation minefield' loomsIn 2021, a California state court threw out a feminist blogger's lawsuit accusing Twitter Inc of unlawfully barring as 'hateful conduct' posts criticizing transgender people. In 2022, a federal court in California tossed a lawsuit by LGBT plaintiffs accusing YouTube, part of Alphabet Inc , of restricting content posted by gay and transgender people. Because justices who invoke founding fathers to justify striping people's rights are qualified for this topic I’m sure the ruling will be based on sound jurisprudence. Just kidding! They take their direction from lobbyists now; it will be embarrassing. East Palestine, Ohio - where is FEMA?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Illinois Supreme Court allows massive damages in biometric privacy cases but says lawmakers should weigh inThe Illinois Supreme Court issued a much-anticipated opinion on the state’s biometric privacy law Friday, leaving the door open for massive damages when companies are found to violate residents’ privacy rights but suggesting lawmakers revisit the issue.
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »

Supreme Court won’t hear arguments about immigration’s Title 42 case as plannedWASHINGTON— The Supreme Court says it will not hear arguments as planned March 1 in a case involving a Trump-era immigration policy used several...
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »

Supreme Court won’t hear arguments in Title 42 case as plannedThe court’s action follows a legal filing from the Biden administration saying the case soon will be moot.
Source: SpectrumNews1TX - 🏆 333. / 59 Read more »

Google case before Supreme Court could upend the Internet as we know itAn upcoming Supreme Court case could answer one of the toughest questions of the internet age: Should online companies be held responsible for promoting harmful speech?
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »