Supreme Court justices weren't questioned under oath in leak probe

1:49Patrick Semansky/APin the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case last May.

The draft opinion was leaked and published by Politico on May 2. The copy of the draft opinion showed a majority of justices appeared to vote to effectively overrule the 1973 landmark abortion precedent set in Roe v. Wade.The findings were independently reviewed by former judge and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who provided an independent analysis.

In this May 3, 2022, file photo, demonstrators protest outside of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., following news report by Politico that a draft opinion suggests the justices could be poised to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide.as a national precedent and returned the decision on the legality of abortion to the states.

John Roberts must resign...!

If she didn't ask anybody any questions under oath she wouldn't have a reason to suspect anyone.

Arrest the Politico reporter that posted the news!

Translation: The “investigation” was merely a charade from the start. The intent was never actually to find and publicly identify the source of the leak.

More classified documents…..seems careless and totally irresponsible…..

The government is so corrupt and just an absolute embarrassment.

What a surprise the leak was not found.

Instead of using outside investigators, the Supreme Court choose to investigate itself. Does anyone have a problem with this?

In other words, she can’t afford to lose her job.

I'm thinking there's one....

Did she look to see if any had their fingers crossed when they answered not under oath?

Why weren’t the Supreme Court Justices questioned under Oath? Oh! Maybe it’s because they Think that they’re above the Law.

Is this woman crazy? How are you going to uncover anything about the justices if you don't interview them?

Wow. So that seems like don’t ask don’t tell. Why on earth wouldn’t they interview everyone?

Lol. Okay. Well, then we know where the leak came from then.

This is a real threat to democracy, unlike the made up one by the Dems. Also, the leak was almost guaranteed at Democrat.

Some investigation.

What a load of BS. She is corrupt.

Cocaine is a hell of a drug

Lmao. Okay. Please.

What else would she say if she likes her job?

Well in all fairness, taking an oath didn't really result in truthful testimony before Congress, ironically regarding the same issue that led to this investigation.

Were the Justices deposed?

Can you say b.s?

There’s two who definitely should have been questioned under oath.

Chicks!

So the leak investigation was as thorough and legitimate as the investigation into Kavanaugh’s sexual assault history. Makes sense. The Scotus doesn’t even pretend that they are not above the law.

👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

Supreme Court investigates itself but refuses to put justices under oath. Fixed it

This court is a joke.

A professional wrestling referee could have done a better job than her.

Sham investigation or complete incompetence. Your choice.

Bull Sh*t. We all know that they know exactly who leaked it.

Hell of a way to conduct an investigation…

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court releases report of investigation into Dobbs decision leakThe Supreme Court announced Thursday an investigation into who leaked a draft decision overturning Roe v. Wade last year was inconclusive. Were the supreme court employees interviewed under oath? If no, why not? Lame. Let’s hope they’ve tightened security.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Supreme Court says it cannot determine who leaked draft Dobbs opinionThe leak of Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.’s draft opinion was an extraordinary breach of decorum and practice at the court. Can't or won't? Alito did it, but ok His name is Samuel.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court investigation fails to identify leaker of Dobbs draft decisionAfter the leak of a Supreme Court draft decision that would overturn Roe v. Wade, the court launched an investigation, but it has yielded no culprits as of January. Those investigating Dobbs leak never thought to interview people that Alito had dinner with? Cuz it's Clarence/his wife and/or Alito... Check their phones and emails... brithume I'm not buying the conclusion. Did they interrogate the justices? Conduct lie detector analysis as is authorized to be administered to all of us who hold security positions? This conclusion supports the hypothesis that the supreme court can't be trusted.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Supreme Court is unable to ID the leaker in Dobbs decisionThe court called the leak 'one of the worst breaches of trust in its history.' The Marshal of the Supreme Court 'has to date been unable to identify a person responsible,' the court said Thursday. Must have those Alito blinders on Oh they know…. Easy: Clarence’s wife Ginni
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court is unable to ID the leaker in Dobbs decisionThe court called the leak 'one of the worst breaches of trust in its history.' The Marshal of the Supreme Court 'has to date been unable to identify a person responsible,' the court said Thursday.
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court unable to find source of Dobbs leakInformation that investigators obtained from the court’s IT system was used to identify individuals of interest and led to “multiple interviews with certain employees,” the report…
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »