Brazil’s Supreme Court Authorizes Probe of Former President Bolsonaro Over Riots

had eroded trust in the electoral system for years

They pointed to Mr. Bolsonaro’s weekly live broadcasts on social media, public statements and declarations to supporters on the street in which he warned that the voting system could be rigged. Mr. Bolsonaro also met with dozens of foreign diplomats in July last year and cast doubts on the reliability of the electoral system, prosecutors wrote.Photo:Prosecutors also cited comments made by Mr. Bolsonaro a day after the riots at the U.S. Capitol on Jan.

Prosecutors also mentioned assertions by Mr. Bolsonaro that he had won the 2018 election by a much larger margin than the one announced by the electoral court. In public statements, Mr. Bolsonaro has often cited a case in which a hacker got inside the electronic voting system in 2018—an incident that police said didn’t alter the result.

There are no evidence for this. What we have now in Brazil are criminals (several, you can see, is public) ruling the crountry. In the system, Supreme Court is involved.

The wef has only got one play, I guess.

SERGIOJUNIOR79r BrazilianCensorship

SERGIOJUNIOR79r He authorizes anything against Bolsonaro, but won’t ever authorize a proper ballot audit 🤡

SERGIOJUNIOR79r Fake

Same playbook as here. Steal an election from a popular winner and give it to a puppet commie. When the people protest lick them up and blame the guy who actually won the election. Hmmm seems like I’ve seen that before.

Wow a real democracy!

How cute. I wonder where they got that idea from. Sketch your way to victory and use the negative reaction to benefit you in future elections as well. The only real downside is the bad taste taking political prisoners might give you. But it's small price to pay for power.

The scandal is obvious: the Supreme Court released the new president from jail. He had been arrested because of corruption (judged for 10 judges). But the Supreme Court created an artifact to release him. The same court prohibited the auditable vote; and so on...

Forecast: By December 23, Brazilians will be starving.... ....another company will close and dismiss employees! Dictator and Genocide Lula (PT). Government concerned about assaulting, torturing and arresting patriots.

Seeing a global pattern emerge..

Infiltrated people from President Lula's party (PT), wore yellow shirts and broke everything. When the Patriots arrived, they took the blame for everything. The government already knew 3 days before, and did nothing, it waited to break to blame the Patriots.

Trump did it!! 😝😝

Sound familiar?

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court lets New York enforce gun law during lawsuitNew York can for now continue to enforce a sweeping new law that bans guns from “sensitive places” such as schools, playgrounds and Times Square, the Supreme Court said Wednesday.
Source: PhillyInquirer - 🏆 81. / 68 Read more »

Garfield Heights security guard’s death sentence appealed before Ohio Supreme CourtMatthew Nicholson was convicted and put on death row for the 2018 murders of Giselle Lopez, 19, and Manuel Lopez Jr., 17, in Garfield Heights.
Source: clevelanddotcom - 🏆 301. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court allows New York gun law to remain in effect for nowThe Supreme Court allowed a NY gun control law that was enacted in the wake of the high court’s landmark ruling in June that dramatically expanded the right to bear arms outside the home to remain in effect while a legal challenge against it continues.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court hears case threatening workers’ rightsChris Hayes: “In this age of minority rule, the defenders of unfettered capitalism have an ally in the Supreme Court. Sure enough, today the Court heard oral arguments in a case where they appear to be leaning towards allowing companies to more easily sue unions for property damage from strikes.” I heard a whistle-blower has come forward... tsk tsk Why wouldn't they be able to sue unions for property damage from strikes? I am 100% for unions. However, if anyone damages anyone’s property, I do not think it’s wrong to hold them accountable.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court should end federal government’s water overreachFor decades, there’s been confusion regarding what waters are regulated under the Clean Water Act.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »