Umm, why shouldn't they be able to recoup losses from such a thing? How f'n insane does this need to get? So now you think mobs of union workers should be able to destroy property and face no recourse?
WHY the GOP hates the Middle-Class
so slavery is cool again
Holy crap! You don't agree that those creating the damage should be those who pay for it?!? Typical MSNBC.
Communists in the USA are protected by the umbrella of capitalism, which has given them everything they own. They don't actually have to live it. Communism takes. Steals. Capitalism creates. Communist countries build walls to keep people in. We have the opposite problem.
We demand full honesty. Democrat's Unions are the delivery apparatus of Marxism. They are a Trojan Horse. 'Marx believed there was revolutionary potential for trade unions as a class movement.'
If they foment INSURRECTION they should be responsible for the damage. We’re all against INSURRECTION, aren’t we?
People who destroy property being held accountable for it is not a new thing. Just a foreign one to Dems.
Unfettered capitalism brings us burning rivers, child labor, and injured workers with no safety net. Capitalism is great but it needs guard rails.
Side with the rich, as always
Well ChrisHayesTV , how would you feel if air traffic controllers all walked off the job mid-flight? Or doctors in the middle of a surgery on your child? Firefighters at your house? What’s wrong with responsible striking where people and property are not hurt?
Knowing you’re going to strike and doing something like filling cement trucks up prior to striking in order to extort demands from your employer is criminal.
To the commies here at MSNBC, your 'unfettered capitalism' is a 'free(r) market' to those of us with working neurons.
Republicans are not in favor of unregulated capitalism. This is a lie. The corporate structure is pro illegal immigration, pro biased media, pro censorship, pro vax, pro porn, and pro multiculturalism. These things don't describe the modern right.
And the problem is....?
And this is wrong why?
I am 100% for unions. However, if anyone damages anyone’s property, I do not think it’s wrong to hold them accountable.
The public sees the Conservatives on the court for who they are and how they operate. Originalism is a joke. Three of the justices should be impeached.
Why wouldn't they be able to sue unions for property damage from strikes?
I heard a whistle-blower has come forward... tsk tsk
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court weighs concrete company's damage claim from strikeThe Supreme Court will hear a dispute between the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and a concrete company in Washington state that labor advocates say could weaken workers’ rights if the ruling goes against the union. NBC is left wing propaganda They've destroyed womans rights, are itching to take away the rights of minorities and the LGBT community, why not trash unions next. Back to the fields for our toiling, peasants. A union needs to be held responsible for its actions same as the Company.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Supreme Court seeks U.S. government view on charter school's skirt requirement(Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday asked President Joe Biden's administration to weigh in on whether the justices should decide whether a publicly funded charter school in North Carolina may have violated the rights of female students - deemed 'fragile vessels' by the school's founder - by requiring girls to wear skirts. The justices are considering whether to hear an appeal by Charter Day School, located in the southeastern North Carolina town of Leland and operated by a private educational management company, of a lower court's ruling that found that the dress code ran afoul of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law. Wtf...lol...why...the fake girls don't want their ball's showing or something....👀 The shorter the better. What year is it?
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Illinois Supreme Court sees female majority for first time in state's historyThe Illinois Supreme Court met for the first time since the new year on Tuesday with a first-ever female majority since Illinois became a state in 1818.
Source: fox32news - 🏆 547. / 51 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court considers narrowing federal protections for unionsU.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday wrestled with a labor dispute that could narrow federal protections for unions by making it easier for employers to sue over strikes that result in damage to company property. Reuters is Soooo biased , it’s hard to believe anything they report. *Whelping* They should consider narrowing federal protections for their lives
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Brazil's Supreme Court orders arrest of Bolsonaro's ex-justice minister, source saysBrazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has ordered the arrest of former Justice Minister Anderson Torres, who served under former President Jair Bolsonaro and who was in charge of public security in Brasilia during Sunday's invasion of government buildings, a source told Reuters on Tuesday. See Murica, that's how ya do it. AS I SAID BEFORE… DICTATORSHIP Brilliant lock 🔐 them up 🆙
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Troubled Teamsters: Supreme Court may deal a blow to striking unionsThe Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared poised to rule in favor of a Washington-based concrete company seeking to revive a lawsuit filed against the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, claiming that a strike damaged its cement product. Better be careful of what you wish for, I hear the first thing to go after AI is self driving long hauling! Just saying
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »