Opinion | This is the most mischaracterized Supreme Court case in recent memory

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 17 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Opinion by Jason Willick: The case will not, no matter which side wins, grant state legislatures “the power to overturn presidential elections.” After oral arguments, it appears that Moore v. Harper may produce a fairly technical and limited legal outcome.

on Wednesday. But if the justices were advancing a “plan” to “literally steal” the next election, it was not evident in three hours of civil colloquies with lawyers.has the unhappy distinction of being the subject of more political and media distortion than any Supreme Court case in recent memory., no matter which side wins, grant state legislatures “the power to overturn presidential elections.

This is a classic problem of constitutional procedure with plausible arguments on both sides — exactly what the Supreme Court is designed to settle so American democracy can function smoothly. Yet news coverage cast the “independent state legislature theory” as “What prompted all the partisan fire and fury? For one, Donald Trump.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

No surprise that he would have us believe that Moore v. Harper is a harmless little dispute. The fact that an overwhelming majority of respected scholars on the right, as well was the left, mightily disagree with him tells us much about the validity of his arrogant claims.

It is perhaps instructive to recognize that Mr. Willick is a former editorial writer for the Wall Street Journal, a paragon of Rupert Murdochian right wing dogma, distortion and disinformation that foments on the far right edge of political dialogue.

jawillick So the author of this piece thinks he knows better than Justice Kagan and retired Judge Luttig

jawillick I know nothing about the law but I am fairly certain Jason Willick does not either. What a load of crap.

That is a willfully blind interpretation

What gaslighting!

We all note that you didn't have the balls to write this before oral argument.

Nothing new from the dems! It’s their way or it’s election interference when all along it has been the dems creating the election interference in the first place! Wake up people!

Incredibly naive. Of course GOP won't say they plan to use this to simply decree election winners. There will always be some pretext of discovered 'fraud'. But if the GOP prevails in this case, state legislatures will essentially have unchecked power to ensure their team wins.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Opinion | US Supreme Court Wants to Make America More Bigoted Again'The Supreme Court appears hell-bent on making America bigoted again. Step-by-step, they're undoing every bit of progressive legislation from the past 80 years that they can find.' SCOTUS may be wearing the wrong color robes?
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Listen Live: Supreme Court hears arguments in case that could upend federal election rulesThe case Moore v. Harper stems from North Carolina Republicans' redrawing of the state's congressional map after the 2020 Census. Supreme? Can you hear Clarence snoring? ZZZZZZZZ That’s because the government would make it even worse
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

‘You should die in a locked closet’: Dallas judge’s admonishment reversed by Supreme CourtThe state judicial ethics commission should not have reprimanded a Dallas judge who told a man convicted of brutally killing a child that he deserved to die...
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »

Supreme Court takes up redistricting case that could reshape votingA broad ruling could threaten hundreds of election laws and lead to new efforts to redraw congressional districts to maximize partisan advantage.
Source: WTVYNews4 - 🏆 590. / 51 Read more »

The Debunked 'Independent State Legislature Theory' Is on the Supreme Court Docket—With Potentially Disastrous ConsequencesIn Moore v. Harper, being argued at the Supreme Court on Thursday, the justices will decide whether the North Carolina Supreme Court has the power to strike down the legislature’s illegally gerrymandered congressional map for violating the North Carolina Constitution.What's the case all about? Why did the Court take it in the first place? And what is the dubious 'independent state legislature theory'?
Source: MsMagazine - 🏆 378. / 59 Read more »