Jack Daniel’s had asked the justices to hear its case against the manufacturer of the plastic Bad Spaniels toy. The toy mimics the Jack Daniel’s bottle and label but is a parody.
While the original bottle has the words “Old No. 7 brand” and “Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey,” the parody proclaims: “The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet.” The toy is part of a line of VIP Products called Silly Squeakers that mimic liquor, beer, wine and soda bottles. They include Mountain Drool, which parodies Mountain Dew, and Heini Sniff'n, which parodies Heineken. A court in 2008 barred the company from selling its Budweiser parody, ButtWiper.
A number of major companies from the makers of Campbell Soup to outdoor brand Patagonia and jeans maker Levi Strauss had urged the justices to take what they said was an important case for trademark law. TOP STORIES: Mooresville Police hit speeds of 110mph during pursuit that ended in deadly crash | Off-duty Stinesville reserve officer arrested in alleged OWI crash | Richard Allen charged with urder in 2017 killings of Libby German and Abby Williams | Pstudent injured by sheriff candidate's 'accidental discharge' of weapon in Indiana classroom |
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Jack Daniel's, Arizona pet toymaker square off in Supreme Court in trademark fight - Phoenix Business JournalThe Supreme Court will decide whether an Arizona manufacturer of pet toys infringed on Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7 trademark with its Bad Spaniels Old No. 2 squeaky toy for dogs.
Source: phxbizjournal - 🏆 254. / 63 Read more »
'Deeply held beliefs': Colorado designer before Supreme Court says she cannot condone LGBT weddingsCustom website and graphic designer Lorie Smith doesn't want to be forced to create websites for same-sex weddings due to her Christian faith, an issue the Supreme Court will debate next month in a free speech case challenging Colorado's anti-discrimination law. You…cannot…legislate…or…litigate…behavior or beliefs!!! A Private business. If your gospel makes you a bigot, find a new Bible.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Opinion: Supreme Court justices show they have chosen a political agenda to defendCarefully groomed by the Federalist Society, today’s conservative Supreme Court justices are a threat to America. The Tribune is biased. So this is not valid. Its narcissistic. Do you ever publish letters letters from people with functional brains? Do a quick search and see how many times the liberal justices vote with the conservative justices. The good 'news' here is that SD-UT has zero readership and those that still get this rag, know it's a liberal, woke LA Times lite!
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court justices are the only federal judges who are exempt from the Code of ConductSupreme Court justices are the only federal judges exempt from the judicial Code of Conduct, designed to maintain the integrity and independence of the court. Now do one on reform of congress. Supreme Court expansion— such a novel concept conjured up by the most brilliant minds the US has to offer and not at all a lazy way of approaching “solutions” No
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
State lawyers ask Utah Supreme Court to step in after judge declines to dismiss gerrymandering lawsuitLawyers for the state are asking the Utah Supreme Court to intervene after Utah Third District Judge Dianna Gibson declined to dismiss a lawsuit alleging new congressional maps drawn by the Utah Legislature last year are an illegal gerrymander.
Source: sltrib - 🏆 316. / 61 Read more »