Ivison: CSIS elastic interpretation of Emergencies Act puts Trudeau on firmer ground

The Liberals have been adrift on a tossing sea as multiple witnesses testified to the Public Order Emergency Commission that, while the act was helpful, it was not necessary.Sign up to receive daily headline news from Ottawa Citizen, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Postmedia Network Inc.

That definition is outlined in the Emergencies Act as flowing directly from section 2 of the CSIS Act, which states that a threat to the security of Canada requires the threat or use of acts of serious violence against persons or property for the purpose of achieving political, religious or ideological objectives.

Vigneault, who was re-appointed as CSIS director last June, said that his advice was provided as “national security adviser, as opposed to the director of CSIS”. CSIS’ analysis of ideologically-motivated violent extremism has three criteria that moves individuals and/or organizations from actors to targets: a willingness to kill or to inspire others to kill; a desire to attempt societal change; and, an ideological influence.

Yet, as national security adviser Jody Thomas testified last Friday, the government had decided to use a broader definition of a threat to national security than the one laid down explicitly in the Emergencies Act.

NO it does not. one persons opinion that they should ignore the approved law is all that is needed? what kind of dictatorship are you pushing?

Canadian Civil Liberties Association has it right: “government’s argument appears to be that the Emergencies Act doesn’t mean what it says.”

Total BS. Vigneault from Montreal was appointed as head of CSIS BY Trudeau. Rouleau was appointed BY Trudeau, and Lucki was appointed BY Trudeau!

Behind closed doors he suggested it. No email. No text. No communication verified by anyone. And deputy director and other csis members already said it didn’t warrant EA. Odd.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

John Ivison: CSIS elastic interpretation of Emergencies Act puts Trudeau on firmer groundCSIS director seems to have accepted a rather elastic interpretation of the legislation. It remains to be seen whether the inquiry agrees. What the actual F is “elastic interpretation”. Convenient broadening of the definition. In Christianity we call it the spirit of the law opposed to literal interpretation for which it was designed for. Is that the propaganda word of the day fakenews?
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »