Supreme Court to Hear Nursing Home Case That Could Affect Millions

When Susie Talevski sued the agency that managed her elderly father’s care before he died, she hoped to get justice for her family. She did not expect the case would grow into a national bellwether. A ruling against her could strip millions of vulnerable Americans of their power to hold states accountable when they do not receive benefits allowed by law.

In court filings, the Talevski family claims that Gorgi Talevski was overmedicated to keep him asleep, his dementia wasn’t properly managed, and he was involuntarily transferred to different facilities hours away from the family’s home, which accelerated his decline. Her father died a year ago, in October.

“The reach of an adverse decision would be catastrophic,” said Jane Perkins, an attorney at the National Health Law Program. “It would leave these programs really standing out there without a true enforcement mechanism.” Perkins said she sees parallels between this case and the recent Supreme Court decision that overturned the constitutional right to an abortion.

There are other means of oversight, which supporters of the Indiana state agency’s petition tout as viable alternatives to lawsuits. One is federal monitoring by the Department of Health and Human Services. The agency can investigate and threaten to withhold funding from state programs that fail to comply with federal provisions. But this usually involves lengthy legal processes that can be counterproductive, stalling benefits to individual patients, instead of helping them.

Nearly 83 million Americans, a quarter of the U.S. population, are enrolled in Medicaid. This means HHS oversees more than half a trillion dollars in spending across all states and U.S. territories — and the federal agency, the former officials argue, lacks the logistical and practical capacity to “meaningfully remedy individual violations in many cases.”

If the Supreme Court rules in favor of HHC, lawsuits like a 2015 case that won Medicaid recipients the right to an expensive hepatitis C drug may not be possible in the future, said Emily Munson, an attorney with the advocacy group Indiana Disability Rights.

Science?

There go some more rights. USSupremeCourt is completely corrupt, illegitimate and compromised. They need to be defied at every opportunity until they are disbanded.

They should

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

California Supreme Court: Who's Running In The Nov. 8 General Election And Why It MattersUnlike the U.S. Supreme Court, California’s highest court is more obscure and rarely issues polarizing opinions.
Source: LAist - 🏆 606. / 51 Read more »

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Issues Her First Supreme Court OpinionNew Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has issued her first Supreme Court opinion, a short dissent Monday in support of a death row inmate from Ohio. Surprise, she probably wants him free on bail Has she figured out what a woman is yet? In just a short while,she has did more than someone who was there for over twenty years. His wife cause more concerned to the people then he does. No one elected her for anything. Yes she injected her in the public affairs.
Source: NBCNewYork - 🏆 270. / 63 Read more »

Jackson Issues First Dissent Over Supreme Court Refusal to Hear Death Row AppealIn her first opinion—a dissent—U.S. Supreme Court Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson said she would have heard the appeal of an Ohio death row inmate who argues the state suppressed evidence during his trial. Honestly I am not a fan of Joe Biden. But in my opinion Biden appointing Justice Jackson to SCOTUS is definitely one of the best things he’s done in office. Kentanji is someone I actually look up to, she’s an inspirational figure.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Justice Jackson issues her first Supreme Court opinionIn her dissent, Jackson wrote that she would have ordered a new look at Chinn’s case “because his life is on the line and given the substantial likelihood that the suppressed records wo…
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court won't wade into dispute over prosecutor testifying at trial | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court declined on Monday to take up the appeal of a man from Louisiana who says he was denied the right to a fair trial when prosecutors called the assistant district attorney -- who presented the case to the grand jury -- to the witness stand. womp womp… Less Dollar! More Work!! I wish good events would happen at least half of bad events.
Source: cnni - 🏆 326. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court refuses to consider requiring 12-person juriesSupreme Court declines over the objection of two justices to decide whether defendants facing serious criminal charges are legally entitled to a 12-person jury, rejecting an appeal from an Arizona man convicted of fraud by a jury of just eight people. Based on the legal theory that Eight is Enough What’s next……
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »