Supreme Court refuses to consider requiring 12-person juries

  • 📰 NBCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 72 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 32%
  • Publisher: 86%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Supreme Court declines over the objection of two justices to decide whether defendants facing serious criminal charges are legally entitled to a 12-person jury, rejecting an appeal from an Arizona man convicted of fraud by a jury of just eight people.

on Monday declined over the objection of two justices to decide whether defendants facing serious criminal charges are legally entitled to a 12-person jury, rejecting an appeal from an Arizona man convicted of fraud by a jury of just eight people.

The decision not to take up the appeal brought by defendant Ramin Khorrami means states can continue to use of six- or eight-person juries for felony offenses. Arizona and five other states — Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts and Utah — allow the practice. Florida, the third most populous state, uses six-person juries for all non-death penalty-eligible criminal cases.

Conservative Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh said they would have taken up the case, with Gorsuch writing a 10-page dissenting opinion taking aim at the Supreme Court's 1970 decision that said juries could be as small as six people. "For almost all of this nation’s history and centuries before that, the right to trial by jury for serious criminal offenses meant the right to a trial before 12 members of the community," Gorsuch wrote."That mistake continues to undermine the integrity of the nation’s judicial proceedings and deny the American people a liberty their predecessors long and justly considered inviolable," Gorsuch wrote.

Khorrami’s lawyers argue that the Constitution’s Sixth Amendment guarantee to trial by jury, a bedrock legal principal, necessarily requires 12 people, a tradition that dates from medieval England to the current age. A 12-person jury is a common feature in dramatic depictions of criminal trials, such as the 1957 classic film"12 Angry Men."

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

What’s next……

Based on the legal theory that Eight is Enough

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court won't wade into dispute over prosecutor testifying at trial | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court declined on Monday to take up the appeal of a man from Louisiana who says he was denied the right to a fair trial when prosecutors called the assistant district attorney -- who presented the case to the grand jury -- to the witness stand. womp womp… Less Dollar! More Work!! I wish good events would happen at least half of bad events.
Source: cnni - 🏆 326. / 59 Read more »

Case over care at Valparaiso nursing home makes it way to the U.S. Supreme CourtGorgi Talevski’s treatment at the Valparaiso Care and Rehabilitation Center has morphed into a legal case that has made its way through the federal court system and now is scheduled for oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday.
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court considers making challenges to FTC and SEC easierThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday began hearing arguments in two cases that could make it easier to challenge the regulatory power of federal agencies in disputes involving the Federal Trade Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »