in place, are considering a state constitutional amendment that would make it impossible to protect abortion access.would add a sentence to the state's constitution, saying that "[t]o protect human life, nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to secure or protect a right to abortion or require the funding of abortion.
The state's highest court in August denied a request from abortion rights advocates to block an appellate court's ruling allowing for two abortion bans to take effect in the state. However, it decided to hear oral arguments in the case on Nov. 15 to decide on the constitutionality of the laws. "The Kentucky Supreme Court scheduled oral arguments on the trigger ban post-election for a reason. They want to see what Kentuckians have to say in the General Election before they decide the fate of pregnant people across the Commonwealth," said Angela Cooper, spokesperson for the ACLU of Kentucky, one of the groups challenging the state bans.
So just as the SCOTUS intended when it struck down Dobbs. Look at that.
This is what democracy looks like!
It was a great night for reproductive freedom!
Wow just like the SCOTUS decision intended.
Because lots of uncles don’t want to be dads.
And then voted in the very people set to take away the right to abortion. 🙄
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: FOX29philly - 🏆 570. / 51 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Source: NPRHealth - 🏆 144. / 63 Read more »