, joining reliably Democratic California and Vermont in taking that step. An anti-abortion measure in Kentucky was too early to call.and the constitutional right to abortion it guaranteed to women nationwide. The decision in June has led to near-total bans in a dozen states.
"There’s a lot of energy for Prop 3 on campus right now, whether you agree with abortion or not," Roberts said. "I think students want to have the same rights that their parents had when they were younger." James Miller, 66, of Flint, Michigan, said he thought of his daughters, granddaughters and great-granddaughters when he voted in favor of the measure.Michelle Groesser of Swartz Creek, Michigan, said she opposes abortion, even though she believes that any ban likely would have some narrow exceptions. "In a perfect world, I personally would want all life preserved," she said.
Bauer is an abortion opponent who supports some limited exceptions, "but nobody’s willing to throw any kind of compromise ... it’s either a yes or no vote." Lawmakers added the proposed amendment to the ballot last year, a move that some thought would drive more conservative voters to the polls. But after the Roe decision, abortion-rights supporters raised nearly $1.5 million to fight it. They were hoping to repeat the surprise outcome this summer in conservative Kansas, where voters overwhelmingly defeated a similar amendment that would have allowed new bans or restrictions.
Stewart is a registered Republican and opposed to abortion, but still voted no on the amendment. "You got to have a little choice there."What is Roe v. Wade? US Supreme Court decision, explained
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
California Supreme Court: Who's Running In The Nov. 8 General Election And Why It MattersUnlike the U.S. Supreme Court, California’s highest court is more obscure and rarely issues polarizing opinions.
Source: LAist - 🏆 606. / 51 Read more »
Jackson Issues First Dissent Over Supreme Court Refusal to Hear Death Row AppealIn her first opinion—a dissent—U.S. Supreme Court Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson said she would have heard the appeal of an Ohio death row inmate who argues the state suppressed evidence during his trial. Honestly I am not a fan of Joe Biden. But in my opinion Biden appointing Justice Jackson to SCOTUS is definitely one of the best things he’s done in office. Kentanji is someone I actually look up to, she’s an inspirational figure.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Issues Her First Supreme Court OpinionNew Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has issued her first Supreme Court opinion, a short dissent Monday in support of a death row inmate from Ohio. Surprise, she probably wants him free on bail Has she figured out what a woman is yet? In just a short while,she has did more than someone who was there for over twenty years. His wife cause more concerned to the people then he does. No one elected her for anything. Yes she injected her in the public affairs.
Source: NBCNewYork - 🏆 270. / 63 Read more »
New Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in dissent, issues first Supreme Court opinionNew Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has issued her first Supreme Court opinion. Already trying to free criminals..... Fight the good fight Justice Brown! Reinforcements are coming! Did Jane Goodall have to interpret her signs?
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court seems ready to hasten challenges to federal agenciesThe Supreme Court hears arguments in two cases focused on the reach of agencies like the SEC and FTC, about whether businesses and individuals subject to enforcement action by either agency can go directly to federal court with their complaints. vcxvcxv
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court considers fate of landmark Indian adoption lawThe Supreme Court is hearing a case challenging the Indian Child Welfare Act — a law that gives preference in the adoption process to kids' own extended families and tribes to keep them from being separated. Too bad the taliban run Supreme Court only pretend to care about “kids” before they are born The Supreme Court needs to cool its heels, taking away clean water, bodily autonomy & the protections for native children…wtf I was taken from my tribe before this law and have a wonderful adopted family but still….. this is just WRONG
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »